MITE-Net: SWaP-Optimized 4K Video Tiny Target Perception for Embodied Edge SAR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-time tiny target perception in high-resolution imagery is critical for embodied Search-and-Rescue (SAR) missions. However, strict Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) constraints on edge devices like UAVs create a bottleneck: traditional image downsampling causes severe feature loss, while slice-based processing incurs prohibitive latency. To address this gap, this paper introduces a comprehensive framework encompassing a novel architecture, specialized datasets, and hardware-level benchmarks. First, we propose MITE-Net, a SWaP-optimized cascaded architecture, which couples a bio-inspired, learning-free Tiny Target Motion-Based Region Proposal Network (TTM-RPN) with a sub-0.14M-parameter R-CNN-like head. Second, to standardize 4K tiny target evaluation, we construct the SAR-Tiny Datasets by relabeling two challenging UAV datasets: SeaDroneSee-Tiny (dynamic maritime scenes, tiny targets predominantly of 64-256 pixels ) and UAVID-Tiny (cluttered urban scenes, extremely tiny targets, less than 64 pixels). Third, we benchmark against state-of-the-art YOLO models on an edge device, NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier, where MITE-Net directly processes 4K maritime imagery, achieving a 100% search success rate at 30.33 FPS. Consuming merely 3.19 W (9.51 FPS/W), MITE-Net vastly outperforms YOLO baselines in target recall and energy efficiency. Conversely, UAVID-Tiny evaluations expose a compound structural limitation: the learning-free bionic front-end struggles against urban backgrounds, while the ultra-lightweight head lacks representational capacity for complex features. Ultimately, this work delivers an efficient onboard perception paradigm and a rigorous baseline guiding future end-to-end SAR architectures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
- 2018An Intriguing Failing of Convolutional Neural Networks and the CoordConv Solutioncited by 302
- 2017Dilated Residual Networkscited by 293
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 174
- 2022Towards Large-Scale Small Object Detection: Survey and Benchmarkscited by 119
- 2022Slicing Aided Hyper Inference and Fine-tuning for Small Object Detectioncited by 101
9 more
- 2021SeaDronesSee: A Maritime Benchmark for Detecting Humans in Open Watercited by 59
- 2021A Normalized Gaussian Wasserstein Distance for Tiny Object Detectioncited by 52
- 2024Visible-Thermal Tiny Object Detection: A Benchmark Dataset and Baselinescited by 27
- 20221st Workshop on Maritime Computer Vision (MaCVi) 2023: Challenge Resultscited by 14
- 2019A Robust Visual System for Small Target Motion Detection Against Cluttered Moving Backgroundscited by 7
- 2018A Directionally Selective Small Target Motion Detecting Visual Neural Network in Cluttered Backgroundscited by 6
- 2021Attention and Prediction Guided Motion Detection for Low-Contrast Small Moving Targetscited by 6
- 2019A Time-Delay Feedback Neural Network for Discriminating Small, Fast-Moving Targets in Complex Dynamic Environmentscited by 3
- 2025vSTMD: Visual Motion Detection for Extremely Tiny Target at Various Velocitiescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.