mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Thresholds: A Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence Framework for Cold Chain IoT Systems

arXiv 2608.15082 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cold chain logistics has advanced technologically, yet most deployed systems remain reactive monitors, not decision-making agents: thresholds trigger alerts, but nothing relates violations to cumulative product degradation or converts degradation signals into logistics decisions. We address this gap with a Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence (QADI) framework combining three capabilities: a structured quality state representation, Sq = [L, Q, U, R] -- remaining shelf life, degradation rate, estimation uncertainty, and operational risk, all derived and computable from the framework equations; a hybrid quality modeling layer combining physics-based microbial kinetics with a data-driven correction term; and a reasoning layer built on Microsoft Phi-4~citePhi4 with retrieval-augmented generation over a structured domain knowledge base. We benchmark against five baselines -- threshold monitoring, physics-only, physics-plus-noise, optimisation-based decisions, and a rule-based expert system -- across eight cold chain scenarios, using pasteurised milk as the primary case, with ground truth shelf-life drawn from published dairy studies~citeSingh1994, Smigic2015 independent of our model. Comparisons use Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. Across milk and broccoli scenarios, the framework attains mean absolute shelf-life error of 7.2 hours (versus 30.9 hours, physics-only; p<0.001), spoilage rate of 14.5% (versus 16.6%, physics-only and rule-based; p=0.08), and oracle-optimal decisions in 99.5% of scenarios. Removing the LLM reasoning component drops optimality to 45.5% (p<0.001). Expert-rated explanation quality reaches 83% (kappa = 0.71). Ablations show hybrid modeling and LLM reasoning contribute distinct gains, while RAG retrieval mainly drives explanation quality. Code: https://bit.ly/4d6t44C.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2026.

Builds on

2 of 27 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
  2. 2024When IoT Meet LLMs: Applications and Challengescited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Interpretable Hybrid Deep Q-Learning Framework for IoT-Based Food Spoilage Prediction with Synthetic Data Generation and Hardware Validation
  2. 2026Reliable LLM-Powered Decision Engines for Large-Scale Supply Chain Operations: Architecture, Safety, and Performance Guarantees
  3. 2026SupChain-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Real-World Supply Chain Management
  4. 2026Quantum-Inspired Reinforcement Learning for Secure and Sustainable AIoT-Driven Supply Chain Systems
  5. 2026PHMForge: Evaluating LLM Agents on Industrial Prognostics through MCP-Native, Algorithm-Grounded Tools
  6. 2026Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Network for Industrial IoT Predictive Maintenance
  7. 2025Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration Achieves Deterministic, High-Quality Decision Support for Incident Response
  8. 2025Agentic AI Sustainability Assessment for Supply Chain Document Insights