Beyond Thresholds: A Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence Framework for Cold Chain IoT Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cold chain logistics has advanced technologically, yet most deployed systems remain reactive monitors, not decision-making agents: thresholds trigger alerts, but nothing relates violations to cumulative product degradation or converts degradation signals into logistics decisions. We address this gap with a Quality-Aware Decision Intelligence (QADI) framework combining three capabilities: a structured quality state representation, Sq = [L, Q, U, R] -- remaining shelf life, degradation rate, estimation uncertainty, and operational risk, all derived and computable from the framework equations; a hybrid quality modeling layer combining physics-based microbial kinetics with a data-driven correction term; and a reasoning layer built on Microsoft Phi-4~citePhi4 with retrieval-augmented generation over a structured domain knowledge base. We benchmark against five baselines -- threshold monitoring, physics-only, physics-plus-noise, optimisation-based decisions, and a rule-based expert system -- across eight cold chain scenarios, using pasteurised milk as the primary case, with ground truth shelf-life drawn from published dairy studies~citeSingh1994, Smigic2015 independent of our model. Comparisons use Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm correction. Across milk and broccoli scenarios, the framework attains mean absolute shelf-life error of 7.2 hours (versus 30.9 hours, physics-only; p<0.001), spoilage rate of 14.5% (versus 16.6%, physics-only and rule-based; p=0.08), and oracle-optimal decisions in 99.5% of scenarios. Removing the LLM reasoning component drops optimality to 45.5% (p<0.001). Expert-rated explanation quality reaches 83% (kappa = 0.71). Ablations show hybrid modeling and LLM reasoning contribute distinct gains, while RAG retrieval mainly drives explanation quality. Code: https://bit.ly/4d6t44C.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2026.
Builds on
2 of 27 references.
References · 2
- 2024Phi-4 Technical Reportcited by 711
- 2024When IoT Meet LLMs: Applications and Challengescited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Interpretable Hybrid Deep Q-Learning Framework for IoT-Based Food Spoilage Prediction with Synthetic Data Generation and Hardware Validation
- 2026Reliable LLM-Powered Decision Engines for Large-Scale Supply Chain Operations: Architecture, Safety, and Performance Guarantees
- 2026SupChain-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Real-World Supply Chain Management
- 2026Quantum-Inspired Reinforcement Learning for Secure and Sustainable AIoT-Driven Supply Chain Systems
- 2026PHMForge: Evaluating LLM Agents on Industrial Prognostics through MCP-Native, Algorithm-Grounded Tools
- 2026Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Network for Industrial IoT Predictive Maintenance
- 2025Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration Achieves Deterministic, High-Quality Decision Support for Incident Response
- 2025Agentic AI Sustainability Assessment for Supply Chain Document Insights