WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Research
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
WANDR (Wide ANd Deep Research) is a benchmark of 500 realistic, challenging data-collection tasks for research agents. Each task requires a system to discover a large set of entities that satisfy specified criteria (breadth), investigate each entity through multiple coordinated web searches (depth), and return independently verifiable records with supporting sources and excerpts. Tasks are represented as qualification key hierarchies that specify the entities, relationships, evidence, and required count at each level; a hierarchy with n companies, m employees per company, and k sources per employee requires n x m x k records. This structure supports diverse workflows such as market mapping, due diligence, literature review, product comparison, and talent sourcing, with targets ranging from dozens to thousands of records. WANDR replaces static gold answer sets with task-specific judges that refetch cited pages and verify each record against its evidence, allowing evaluation of current and changing facts. Record verdicts are aggregated into soft and hard precision, recall, and F1 scores that distinguish factual quality, coverage, and hierarchical completeness. The tasks are derived from de-identified product-usage logs and produced through a semi-automated pipeline with automated checks, empirical audits, and human review where needed. We evaluate six production research systems and find that the benchmark is far from saturated: at high effort, the strongest system reaches only 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1. Performance degrades as target volume and hierarchy depth increase, with incomplete discovery, missing enrichment, and incomplete evidence construction remaining major bottlenecks. The benchmark and evaluation harness are available at https://github.com/perplexityai/wandr.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.
Builds on
19 of 26 references.
References · 19
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 223
- 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 158
- 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 155
- 2025Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judgecited by 75
- 2025Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Taskscited by 63
- 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 56
- 2026DeepSearchQA: Bridging the Comprehensiveness Gap for Deep Research Agentscited by 44
- 2025MedBrowseComp: Benchmarking Medical Deep Research and Computer Usecited by 28
- 2025DeepWideSearch: Benchmarking Depth and Width in Agentic Information Seekingcited by 20
- 2025FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysiscited by 13
7 more
- 2026DRACO: a Cross-Domain Benchmark for Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivitycited by 11
- 2025VeriWeb: Verifiable Long-Chain Web Benchmark for Agentic Information-Seekingcited by 10
- 2026AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discoverycited by 10
- 2025ScholarSearch: Benchmarking Scholar Searching Ability of LLMscited by 7
- 2026GISA: A Benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistantcited by 6
- 2026Table-as-Search: Formulate Long-Horizon Agentic Information Seeking as Table Completioncited by 5
- 2026WideSeek: Advancing Wide Research via Multi-Agent Scalingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026CAFE: Self-Improving Search Agents Need Co-Evolving Feedback25 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
- 2026DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports
- 2026Benchmarking Hybrid Deep Research Across Database Querying and Web Search
- 2026HiEviDR-Bench: A Benchmark for Hierarchical Evidence Aggregation in Deep Research
- 2025DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generation
- 2026FinResearchBench II: A Deep Research Benchmark with Consensus-Derived Gold Rubrics for Distinguishing Financial Report Quality
- 2025DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research
- 2026SAGE: Benchmarking and Improving Retrieval for Deep Research Agents