ScholarSearch: Benchmarking Scholar Searching Ability of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs)' search capabilities have garnered significant attention. Existing benchmarks, such as OpenAI's BrowseComp, primarily focus on general search scenarios and fail to adequately address the specific demands of academic search. These demands include deeper literature tracing and organization, professional support for academic databases, the ability to navigate long-tail academic knowledge, and ensuring academic rigor. Here, we proposed ScholarSearch, the first dataset specifically designed to evaluate the complex information retrieval capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in academic research. ScholarSearch possesses the following key characteristics: Academic Practicality, where question content closely mirrors real academic learning and research environments, avoiding deliberately misleading models; High Difficulty, with answers that are challenging for single models (e.g., Grok DeepSearch or Gemini Deep Research) to provide directly, often requiring at least three deep searches to derive; Concise Evaluation, where limiting conditions ensure answers are as unique as possible, accompanied by clear sources and brief solution explanations, greatly facilitating subsequent audit and verification, surpassing the current lack of analyzed search datasets both domestically and internationally; and Broad Coverage, as the dataset spans at least 15 different academic disciplines. Through ScholarSearch, we expect to more precisely measure and promote the performance improvement of LLMs in complex academic information retrieval tasks. The data is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/PKU-DS-LAB/ScholarSearch
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.
Builds on
8 of 14 references.
References · 8
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 647
- 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 363
- 2025WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking Agencycited by 188
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
8 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 180
- 2025A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challengescited by 62
- 2025FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysiscited by 14
- 2025DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generationcited by 12
- 2026GISA: A Benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistantcited by 6
- 2026JADE: Expert-Grounded Dynamic Evaluation for Open-Ended Professional Taskscited by 2
- 2026JoyAI-LLM Flash: Advancing Mid-Scale LLMs with Token Efficiencycited by 1
- 2026WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Researchcited by 1
- 2026WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Research14 Aug 2026
- 2026JoyAI-LLM Flash: Advancing Mid-Scale LLMs with Token Efficiency3 Apr 2026
- 2026GISA: A Benchmark for General Information-Seeking Assistant9 Feb 2026
- 2026JADE: Expert-Grounded Dynamic Evaluation for Open-Ended Professional Tasks6 Feb 2026
- 2025DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generation19 Dec 2025
- 2025FinDeepResearch: Evaluating Deep Research Agents in Rigorous Financial Analysis15 Oct 2025
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models10 Sep 2025
- 2025A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges3 Aug 2025