mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Active Perception for Embodied Disambiguation

arXiv 2608.13605 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language provides robots with a flexible task interface, but target ambiguity in embodied environments arises not only from user intent; it can also result from missing taskrelevant physical evidence in the current observation. Existing interactive disambiguation methods primarily obtain additional information by asking the user, whereas occlusion, restricted viewpoints, unreadable text, and unobserved targets require the robot to actively change its observation. We propose an active-perception framework for embodied target disambiguation that uses active observation as the backbone for information acquisition and uses a vision-language model to decide, on the basis of accumulated visual evidence and interaction information, whether to continue observing, request clarification, or complete target selection. Active observation can both directly recover missing discriminative evidence and reveal object names, labels, and semantic attributes, thereby improving user clarification when it remains necessary. Real-robot experiments show that the framework combines physical information acquisition and userintent clarification within a unified embodied disambiguation process.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 22 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  3. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  4. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  5. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  6. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  7. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  8. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
  9. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
  10. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
  11. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 308
  12. 2018Interactive Visual Grounding of Referring Expressions for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 56
5 more
  1. 2021INVIGORATE: Interactive Visual Grounding and Grasping in Cluttercited by 32
  2. 2023CLARA: Classifying and Disambiguating User Commands for Reliable Interactive Robotic Agentscited by 30
  3. 2022Interactive Robotic Grasping with Attribute-Guided Disambiguationcited by 19
  4. 2025Robotic Task Ambiguity Resolution via Natural Language Interactioncited by 8
  5. 2023PROGrasp: Pragmatic Human-Robot Communication for Object Graspingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Look, Zoom, Understand: The Robotic Eyeball for Embodied Perception
  2. 2026I-Perceive: A Foundation Model for Vision-Language Active Perception
  3. 2026Technical Report of RoboSpatial Challenge at CVPR 2026: Selective Reasoning Activation and Reference-Frame Disambiguation for Embodied Spatial Reasoning
  4. 2026The Yes-Man Syndrome: Benchmarking Abstention in Embodied Robotic Agents
  5. 2025Embodied-R1: Reinforced Embodied Reasoning for General Robotic Manipulation
  6. 2024Embodied-RAG: General Non-parametric Embodied Memory for Retrieval and Generation
  7. 2026Vision-Language-Action in Robotics: A Survey of Datasets, Benchmarks, and Data Engines
  8. 2026Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models