mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auditing Frame-Level AUC in Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection: Granularity, Resolution, and Scene Bias

arXiv 2608.11985 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Frame-level area under the ROC curve (AUC) is the dominant evaluation metric for weakly supervised video anomaly detection (WSVAD). Its standard form measures whether an anomalous frame outranks a normal frame drawn from anywhere in the test set. We refer to this comparison as pooled AUC, since it aggregates frame pairs across test videos regardless of source. Pooled AUC therefore credits both event localization and differences between video sources. We audit this protocol on UCF-Crime across recent state-of-the-art models spanning different backbone families. Holding each model's frame scores fixed, we read them under three pairing granularities: global, per anomaly category, and within each video, then repeat the same three-granularity readout on zero-shot scores computed from the models' internal representations. We assess ranking reliability with a paired video bootstrap. Three findings follow. First, pooled AUC does not reliably predict within-video anomaly localization: models with similar pooled scores exhibit large localization differences and rank reversals under stricter granularities. Second, at the benchmark's test-split size, pooled AUC lacks the resolution to support state-of-the-art margins reported in the field. Within each backbone family, it resolves no comparison at those margins, while within-video AUC resolves several over identical predictions. Learned representations further reveal that within-video anomaly structure and detector localization are decoupled. Third, on normal footage alone, every model we examine separates videos by recording properties, such as resolution and color encoding, indicating that scene sensitivity is shared across the setting rather than specific to any architecture. We publicly release a granularity-aware protocol computable from existing predictions and scene-factor annotations for UCF-Crime.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  2. 2018Real-world Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videoscited by 570
  3. 2022Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal Embeddingscited by 155
  4. 2023VadCLIP: Adapting Vision-Language Models for Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 121
  5. 2019Street Scene: A new dataset and evaluation protocol for video anomaly detectioncited by 89
  6. 2023Dual Memory Units with Uncertainty Regulation for Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 88
  7. 2021The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Modelscited by 63
  8. 2024A Closer Look at AUROC and AUPRC under Class Imbalancecited by 56
  9. 2024Advancing Video Anomaly Detection: A Concise Review and a New Datasetcited by 48
  10. 2023Learning Prompt-Enhanced Context Features for Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 43
  11. 2024Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection and Localization with Spatio-Temporal Promptscited by 40
  12. 2023BatchNorm-based Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 22
8 more
  1. 2025VGGSounder: Audio-Visual Evaluations for Foundation Modelscited by 8
  2. 2025Learning to Tell Apart: Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection via Disentangled Semantic Alignmentcited by 8
  3. 2024Area under the ROC Curve has the Most Consistent Evaluation for Binary Classificationcited by 7
  4. 2025Mixture of Experts Guided by Gaussian Splatters Matters: A new Approach to Weakly-Supervised Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
  5. 2025Rethinking Metrics and Benchmarks of Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 3
  6. 2023Is AUC the best measure for practical comparison of anomaly detectors?cited by 2
  7. 2026From Frames to Events: Rethinking Evaluation in Human-Centric Video Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
  8. 2026Is Video Anomaly Detection Misframed? Evidence from LLM-Based and Multi-Scene Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.