Gloss-Free Representation Learning for Cross-Dataset Sign Spotting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sign-language research for resource-constrained languages is often limited by the cost of dense linguistic labels such as glosses, temporal boundaries, and sign order. Broadcast news offers a practical alternative by pairing continuous signing with spoken-language transcripts, but this supervision is weak since text and signing are loosely aligned. Morphologically rich languages such as Turkish add further difficulty, as the same lexical meaning can appear in many inflected forms while some derived forms should remain distinct. We study whether weak transcript-based supervision can pretrain a reusable sign encoder in this setting, where poor text normalization can fragment pseudo-gloss targets and weaken representation learning. Unlike prior pseudo-gloss pipelines designed mainly to improve translation, we test whether the pretrained encoder transfers as a reusable representation for cross-dataset sign spotting. We pretrain on TSL-News, a new Turkish broadcast corpus, using pseudo-gloss labels derived from transcripts rather than manual annotation, comparing rule-based morphological lemmatization with constrained LLM-assisted normalization over a fixed vocabulary. We evaluate the learned representations via cross-dataset sign spotting on a new TSL Spotting Benchmark built from the TSL Dictionary corpus. The LLM-assisted encoder raises top-5 temporal localization mean IoU from 0.235 to 0.465, with 56.2% of examples reaching an IoU of at least 0.50; a frequency analysis suggests this gain is not mainly driven by memorizing frequent pseudo-gloss labels. In a downstream translation check, the same pretraining improves BLEU-4 from 9.60 to 11.04 and ROUGE from 23.48 to 27.43. These results show that loosely aligned broadcast data can provide effective weak supervision for learning sign representations that capture both lexical content and temporal structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
- 2021MetaFormer Is Actually What You Need for Visioncited by 524
- 2023Gloss-free Sign Language Translation: Improving from Visual-Language Pretrainingcited by 105
- 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
- 2024Sign2GPT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translationcited by 57
- 2023Continuous Sign Language Recognition with Correlation Networkcited by 56
- 2020Quantitative Survey of the State of the Art in Sign Language Recognitioncited by 50
- 2020Watch, read and lookup: learning to spot signs from multiple supervisorscited by 35
- 2022Machine Translation from Signed to Spoken Languages: State of the Art and Challengescited by 20
- 2024A Tale of Two Languages: Large-Vocabulary Continuous Sign Language Recognition from Spoken Language Supervisioncited by 15
- 2025SignRep: Enhancing Self-Supervised Sign Representationscited by 15
5 more
- 2025Hands-On: Segmenting Individual Signs from Continuous Sequencescited by 10
- 2024From Rule-Based Models to Deep Learning Transformers Architectures for Natural Language Processing and Sign Language Translation Systems: Survey, Taxonomy and Performance Evaluationcited by 6
- 2023Learnt Contrastive Concept Embeddings for Sign Recognitioncited by 5
- 2023Gloss Alignment Using Word Embeddingscited by 3
- 2025Sign Spotting Disambiguation using Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.