mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

InfraBench: Evaluating Infrastructure Agents Across Layers, Lifecycle, and Risk

arXiv 2608.11234 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.OScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Managing modern computing infrastructure has become a steadily harder problem due to the ever-increasing complexity. Recent advances in AI agents create a timely opportunity to automate infrastructure management tasks, but it remains unclear how well such agents can handle real-world infrastructure complexity. We present InfraBench, a benchmark suite for evaluating AI agents on realistic infrastructure tasks across the full system stack and full operational lifecycle with fine-grained risk assessment. Experiments with 15 agent-model configurations show that even the strongest agent cannot secure a full score across all tasks. Mean effective scores range from roughly 40% to 88% (with per-configuration standard errors of 6-12 points), repeating every task three times reveals that top configurations still pass only a fraction of their attempts, and per-check scoring exposes a general failure pattern: agents may routinely satisfy short-term objectives while leaving non-durable changes, broken distributed invariants, unsafe side effects, and uncleaned state behind. INFRABENCH, including its live leaderboard, tasks, and evaluation harness, is publicly available at infraben.ch.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

17 of 43 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  4. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  5. 2018Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchainscited by 48
  6. 2025ITBench: Evaluating AI Agents across Diverse Real-World IT Automation Taskscited by 48
  7. 2023Recommending Root-Cause and Mitigation Steps for Cloud Incidents using Large Language Modelscited by 38
  8. 2025AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Cloudscited by 36
  9. 2024Building AI Agents for Autonomous Clouds: Challenges and Design Principlescited by 19
  10. 2023Assess and Summarize: Improve Outage Understanding with Large Language Modelscited by 17
  11. 2026DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps Cyclecited by 9
  12. 2026SREGym: A Live Benchmark for AI SRE Agents with High-Fidelity Failure Scenarioscited by 8
5 more
  1. 2024Design and Implementation of ARA Wireless Living Lab for Rural Broadband and Applicationscited by 2
  2. 2021Why Do My Blockchain Transactions Fail? A Study of Hyperledger Fabric (Extended version)*cited by 1
  3. 2023How To Optimize My Blockchain? A Multi-Level Recommendation Approachcited by 1
  4. 2025Revisiting Computational Storage for Data Integrity and Securitycited by 1
  5. 2025On Fault Tolerance of Data Storage Systems: A Holistic Perspectivecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.