mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Agentic Configuration Management (ACM): A Reference Configuration Model for Governed Agentic Systems

arXiv 2608.11166 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic systems are increasingly composed of heterogeneous agents, prompts, tools, models, skills, composite subsystems, policies, and execution workflows whose configurations evolve across frameworks and runtime environments. Existing LLMOps and AgentOps platforms support orchestration and observability but do not provide a common configuration-governance model for representing and governing these systems as coherent, versioned configurations. This paper introduces Agentic Configuration Management (ACM), a framework-independent governance and configuration reference model for heterogeneous agentic systems. ACM combines typed and independently versioned Agentic Configuration Items, immutable revisions and baselines, explicit configuration-runtime separation, lifecycle and assurance semantics, dependency-aware impact propagation, and runtime provenance. Heterogeneous native configurations are normalized through semantic projection into a canonical Configuration Graph on which common governance semantics operate. We provide a Python reference implementation with adapters for LangGraph, CrewAI, and the OpenAI Agents SDK. The evaluation combines 27 governance scenarios with nine quantitative impact-propagation cases. For the evaluated configurations, the three frameworks yield governance-equivalent ACM representations and reproducible governance outcomes after projection. The impact semantics are formalized as monotone propagation over a finite lattice, establishing convergence, termination, and uniqueness of the least fixed point above the initial impact valuation. These results provide evidence that common governance semantics can support reproducibility, auditability, dependency analysis, and interoperability across heterogeneous agentic execution abstractions within the evaluated scope.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

3 of 50 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024AgentOps: Enabling Observability of LLM Agentscited by 46
  2. 2026A Deterministic Control Plane for LLM Coding Agentscited by 3
  3. 2026The Grand Software Supply Chain of AI Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Agent Operating System (AOS): A Reference Operating Architecture for Distributed Agentic Systems
  2. 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AI
  3. 2026Agentic Service-Oriented Computing: A Manifesto for the Next Frontier of Service-Oriented Computing
  4. 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AI
  5. 2025Taming Uncertainty via Automation: Observing, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2026OpenAgentFlow: Enabling System-Wide Safety Boundaries for Heterogeneous AI Agent Fleets
  7. 2026AgentFlow: Building Agent Dependency Graphs for Static Analysis of Agent Programs
  8. 2025AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise