mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Deterministic Control Plane for LLM Coding Agents

arXiv 2606.26924 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CRcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM coding harnesses grant agents broad file and shell access, yet the configuration layer that steers them -- rules files, agent definitions, IDE-specific markdown -- is largely unmanaged. A prevalence study of 10,008 public GitHub repositories (n=6,145 agent config files) finds that agent configurations propagate as undeclared shared components: 10.1% of tracked paths are SHA-256 exact duplicates across independent repositories (fork-adjusted, threshold-independent), with 75.5% of clone pairs crossing organisational boundaries. Two further patterns are indicative: configurations are rarely revised (58% single-commit; 0.4 vs 0.6 commits/month age-normalised against CI/CD workflows), and rarely declare permission boundaries (<1% of agent configs vs 33% of Actions workflows, n=31 true positives). We propose a deterministic control plane above the harness that maps one-to-one to these gaps. Rel(AI)Build treats agent definitions as a managed supply chain (SHA-256 content addressing, HMAC-stamped lockfiles, hash-chained audit logs); enforces tiered permissions and attack-derived blocklists before LLM invocation; gates feature work through a phase state machine with requirement-to-file-to-test traceability; compiles a single canonical definition to seven IDE targets; and detects prompt drift via Jaccard similarity. Conformance tests on injected violations confirm each mechanism enforces its stated invariant; developer outcomes remain future work. Governance of this layer must be deterministic and tool-agnostic -- not delegated to further LLM orchestration.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

14 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  2. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug

Other references · 11

  1. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
  2. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  3. 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
  4. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 365
  5. 2023Prompt Cache: Modular Attention Reuse for Low-Latency Inferencecited by 268
  6. 2021Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Languagecited by 176
  7. 2020Backstabber's Knife Collection: A Review of Open Source Software Supply Chain Attackscited by 61
  8. 2022Taxonomy of Attacks on Open-Source Software Supply Chainscited by 58
  9. 2021What are Weak Links in the npm Supply Chain?cited by 16
  10. 2025"Your AI, My Shell": Demystifying Prompt Injection Attacks on Agentic AI Coding Editorscited by 15
  11. 2025AI Risk-Management Standards Profile for General-Purpose AI (GPAI) and Foundation Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Inside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures
  2. 2026Harness Engineering for Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study
  3. 2026CURATE: Leveraging LLM Agents to Compose, Catalog, and Deploy Reproducible Workflows
  4. 2026Scanning the Harness: A Repository Study of Configuration Exposures in AI Coding Agents
  5. 2025Decoding the Configuration of AI Coding Agents: Insights from Claude Code Projects
  6. 2026When Agents Implement Systems: A Case Study in Defects, Detection, and Evaluation Rigor
  7. 2026TraceLab: Characterizing Coding Agent Workloads for LLM Serving
  8. 2025Agent READMEs: An Empirical Study of Context Files for Agentic Coding