Remedying uncertainty representations in visual inference through Explaining-Away Variational Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimal computations under uncertainty require an adequate probabilistic representation about beliefs. Deep generative models, and specifically Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), have the potential to meet this demand by building latent representations that learn to associate uncertainties with inferences while avoiding their characteristic intractable computations. Yet, we show that it is precisely uncertainty representation that suffers from inconsistencies under an array of relevant computer vision conditions: contrast-dependent computations, image corruption, out-of-distribution detection. Drawing inspiration from classical computer vision, we present a principled extension to the standard VAE by introducing a simple yet powerful inductive bias through a global scaling latent variable, which we call the Explaining-Away VAE (EA-VAE). By applying EA-VAEs to a spectrum of computer vision domains and a variety of datasets, spanning standard NIST datasets to rich medical and natural image sets, we show the EA-VAE restores normative requirements for uncertainty. Furthermore, we provide an analytical underpinning of the contribution of the introduced scaling latent to contrast-related and out-of-distribution related modulations of uncertainty, demonstrating that this mild inductive bias has stark benefits in a broad set of problems. Moreover, we find that EA-VAEs recruit divisive normalization, a motif widespread in biological neural networks, to remedy defective inference. Our results demonstrate that an easily implemented, still powerful update to the VAE architecture can remedy defective inference of uncertainty in probabilistic computations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2024.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,058
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 972
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 527
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2020Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligencecited by 118
1 more
- 2020Simple and Effective VAE Training with Calibrated Decoderscited by 57
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2026ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generationcited by 3
- 2025Quantifying the uncertainty of model-based synthetic image quality metricscited by 2
- 2025CheXmask-U: Quantifying uncertainty in landmark-based anatomical segmentation for X-ray imagescited by 2
- 2026TAVAE: A VAE with Adaptable Priors Explains Contextual Modulation in the Visual Cortexcited by 0
- 2026ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation11 Aug 2026
- 2026TAVAE: A VAE with Adaptable Priors Explains Contextual Modulation in the Visual Cortex12 Feb 2026
- 2025CheXmask-U: Quantifying uncertainty in landmark-based anatomical segmentation for X-ray images11 Dec 2025
- 2025Quantifying the uncertainty of model-based synthetic image quality metrics4 Apr 2025