DOCSCHISEL: Adaptive Tool Documentation Optimization Framework for LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to accomplish complex real-world tasks, making tool documentation a critical grounding resource for LLM agents. Existing studies mainly focus on improving the tool-use capabilities of LLM agents, while largely treating tool documentation as a fixed input. Although several recent works attempt to optimize tool documentation through rewriting or compression, little is known about how the information contained in tool documentation affects agent performance across different settings. To bridge this gap, we conduct a large-scale empirical study on tool documentation for LLM agents. Our study reveals substantial heterogeneity in the information fields provided by existing tool documentation. Moreover, the effectiveness of different information fields is highly dependent on the task domain, LLM backbone, and agent paradigm, indicating that no fixed tool documentation can consistently generalize across diverse agent settings. Motivated by these findings, we propose DocsChisel, an adaptive tool documentation optimization framework for LLM agents. DocsChisel analyzes failed execution traces of a target LLM agent to identify documentation-related issues, and iteratively optimizes tool documentation by adding, removing, and refining information fields for each tool. We evaluate DocsChisel against two state-of-the-art baselines, i.e., EasyTool and DRAFT. Experimental results show that DocsChisel improves the task success rate of LLM agents by 95.89% over the original tool documentation and by 75.15%, on average, over existing baselines, while incurring limited optimization time and token overhead
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 37 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
37 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 16
Same direction, newest first
- 2026JTPRO: A Joint Tool-Prompt Reflective Optimization Framework for Language Agents20 Apr
- 2026Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use23 Feb
- 2025Verification-Guided Context Optimization for Tool Calling via Hierarchical LLMs-as-Editors15 Dec
- 2025ToolScope: Enhancing LLM Agent Tool Use through Tool Merging and Context-Aware Filtering22 Oct
- 2025LoSemB: Logic-Guided Semantic Bridging for Inductive Tool Retrieval11 Aug
- 2025PLAY2PROMPT: Zero-shot Tool Instruction Optimization for LLM Agents via Tool Play18 Mar
- 2024From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions10 Oct
- 2024Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agents26 May
- 2024AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Calls6 Feb
- 2024EASYTOOL: Enhancing LLM-based Agents with Concise Tool Instruction11 Jan
- 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use4 Oct
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs31 Jul
4 more
Other references · 21
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
- 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
- 2024LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Aheadcited by 155
- 2023On the Tool Manipulation Capability of Open-source Large Language Modelscited by 122
- 2024CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environmentscited by 69
9 more
- 2023Tool Documentation Enables Zero-Shot Tool-Usage with Large Language Modelscited by 66
- 2021Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and Processcited by 56
- 2024WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Settingcited by 47
- 2023ChatGPT for Shaping the Future of Dentistry: The Potential of Multi-Modal Large Language Modelcited by 40
- 2024ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agentscited by 36
- 2024SOEN-101: Code Generation by Emulating Software Process Models Using Large Language Model Agentscited by 34
- 2024Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 26
- 2026Benchmarking LLM Tool-Use in the Wildcited by 15
- 2021Automatic Detection of Five API Documentation Smells: Practitioners' Perspectivescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration
- 2026OpaqueToolsBench: Learning Nuances of Tool Behavior Through Interaction
- 2026ToolMenuBench: Benchmarking Tool-Menu Filtering Strategies for Reliable and Efficient LLM Agents
- 2026Action-Space Shaping for LLM Agents: Measuring and Mitigating Tool-Schema Bias
- 2025Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are Unreliable
- 2026How Consistent Are LLM Agents? Measuring Behavioral Reproducibility in Multi-Step Tool-Calling Pipelines
- 2026ToolAtlas: Learning Once, Reusing Everywhere with Tool-Side Memory
- 2025LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering