Cultivar: A Contrastive and Locale-Oriented Translation Benchmark for Investigating Contamination and Localisation Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multilingual translation benchmarks are typically sourced in English and translated into other languages, treating language pairs as the unit of evaluation---a design that is prone to contamination over time and overlooks locale and cultural considerations. We therefore advocate for source-contrastive evaluation and instantiate it with Cultivar, a localised subset of FLORES, which enables locale-specific translation evaluation. When paired with unlocalised counterparts, performance discrepancy allows the probing of data contamination and localisation robustness. We benchmark 32 open-weight models and find that MT-specialised models are less robust, a few models potentially overfit FLORES, and models tend to translate US content better than that of other locales, regardless of language.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
References · 20
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
- 2023MADLAD-400: A Multilingual And Document-Level Large Audited Datasetcited by 181
- 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 129
- 2024EuroLLM: Multilingual Language Models for Europecited by 106
- 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
- 2025WMT24++: Expanding the Language Coverage of WMT24 to 55 Languages & Dialectscited by 79
8 more
- 2022Tackling Ambiguity with Images: Improved Multimodal Machine Translation and Contrastive Evaluationcited by 26
- 2024Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barrierscited by 26
- 2025BOUQuET: dataset, Benchmark and Open initiative for Universal Quality Evaluation in Translationcited by 22
- 2025Seed-X: Building Strong Multilingual Translation LLM with 7B Parameterscited by 21
- 2026Tiny Aya: Bridging Scale and Multilingual Depthcited by 15
- 2026Hy-MT2: A Family of Fast, Efficient and Powerful Multilingual Translation Models in the Wildcited by 10
- 2023CODET: A Benchmark for Contrastive Dialectal Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 9
- 2026When Flores Bloomz Wrong: Cross-Direction Contamination in Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Last Translation Benchmarkcited by 1
- 2026Last Translation Benchmark3 Sep 2026