When Flores Bloomz Wrong: Cross-Direction Contamination in Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can be benchmark-contaminated, resulting in inflated scores that mask memorization as generalization, and in multilingual settings, this memorization can even transfer to "uncontaminated" languages. Using the FLORES-200 translation benchmark as a diagnostic, we study two 7-8B instruction-tuned multilingual LLMs: Bloomz, which was trained on FLORES, and Llama as an uncontaminated control. We confirm Bloomz's FLORES contamination and demonstrate that machine translation contamination can be cross-directional, artificially boosting performance in unseen translation directions due to target-side memorization. Further analysis shows that recall of memorized references often persists despite various source-side perturbation efforts like paraphrasing and named entity replacement. However, replacing named entities leads to a consistent decrease in BLEU, suggesting an effective probing method for memorization in contaminated models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 236
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 230
- 2023Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samplescited by 195
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 142
- 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 129
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
7 more
- 2021Memorization vs. Generalization: Quantifying Data Leakage in NLP Performance Evaluationcited by 70
- 2020PMIndia -- A Collection of Parallel Corpora of Languages of Indiacited by 42
- 2024Data Contamination Can Cross Language Barrierscited by 26
- 2022SALTED: A Framework for SAlient Long-Tail Translation Error Detectioncited by 23
- 2024Data Contamination Report from the 2024 CONDA Shared Taskcited by 20
- 2025Overestimation in LLM Evaluation: A Controlled Large-Scale Study on Data Contamination's Impact on Machine Translationcited by 13
- 2022Finding Memo: Extractive Memorization in Constrained Sequence Generation Taskscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Cultivar: A Contrastive and Locale-Oriented Translation Benchmark for Investigating Contamination and Localisation Robustnesscited by 1
- 2026Data Contamination in Neural Hieroglyphic Translation: A Reproducibility Studycited by 0
- 2026The University of Melbourne WMT 2026 CreoleMT Submission: A Domain-Balanced Approach to Low-Resource Pacific Creole Machine Translationcited by 0
- 2026The University of Melbourne WMT 2026 CreoleMT Submission: A Domain-Balanced Approach to Low-Resource Pacific Creole Machine Translation12 Sep 2026
- 2026Cultivar: A Contrastive and Locale-Oriented Translation Benchmark for Investigating Contamination and Localisation Robustness10 Aug 2026
- 2026Data Contamination in Neural Hieroglyphic Translation: A Reproducibility Study8 May 2026