Triple Expert Learning from Noisy Labels for Semi-Supervised Vision Foundation Model Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semi-supervised adaptation of vision foundation models (VFMs) commonly freezes the pretrained backbone and updates lightweight modules such as LoRA. However, pseudo-labels have mixed reliability, and a single LoRA adapter must absorb reliable, ambiguous, and noisy gradients in the same low-rank space. This can make VFM adaptation sensitive to pseudo-label noise. We propose TriNoL, a Triple-expert learning framework from Noisy Labels for semi-supervised VFM adaptation. TriNoL routes unlabeled samples into three confidence regions and assigns them to three LoRA experts: a Positive Expert for high-confidence pseudo-labels, an Alignment Expert for medium-confidence ambiguous samples, and a Negative Expert for low-confidence noisy samples. The VFM backbone remains frozen, and only the LoRA experts and classifier head are updated. By separating different pseudo-label reliability regions into specialized adaptation paths, TriNoL improves robustness to noisy supervision while keeping the training cost low.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.
Builds on
33 of 48 references.
References · 33
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 714
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
21 more
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
- 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2021A Survey on Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 250
- 2022FreeMatch: Self-adaptive Thresholding for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 232
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2023SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 133
- 2022Debiased Learning from Naturally Imbalanced Pseudo-Labelscited by 85
- 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 85
- 2022Semi-supervised Vision Transformers at Scalecited by 49
- 2023Enhancing CLIP with CLIP: Exploring Pseudolabeling for Limited-Label Prompt Tuningcited by 30
- 2021Semi-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 24
- 2024Fine-Tuning is Fine, if Calibratedcited by 24
- 2024Erasing the Bias: Fine-Tuning Foundation Models for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2023Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by bridging high and low-confidence predictionscited by 11
- 2025Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation modelscited by 6
- 2025TRiCo: Triadic Game-Theoretic Co-Training for Robust Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2026Revisiting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning under Limited Supervision: Semi-supervised Chain-of-Thought Learningcited by 4
- 2025Unlabeled Data vs. Pre-trained Knowledge: Rethinking SSL in the Era of Large Modelscited by 3
- 2026Semi-Supervised Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.