mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Convex Calibrated Surrogates for the Multi-Label F-Measure

arXiv 2009.07801 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2020stat.ML cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The F-measure is a widely used performance measure for multi-label classification, where multiple labels can be active in an instance simultaneously (e.g. in image tagging, multiple tags can be active in any image). In particular, the F-measure explicitly balances recall (fraction of active labels predicted to be active) and precision (fraction of labels predicted to be active that are actually so), both of which are important in evaluating the overall performance of a multi-label classifier. As with most discrete prediction problems, however, directly optimizing the F-measure is computationally hard. In this paper, we explore the question of designing convex surrogate losses that are calibrated for the F-measure -- specifically, that have the property that minimizing the surrogate loss yields (in the limit of sufficient data) a Bayes optimal multi-label classifier for the F-measure. We show that the F-measure for an s-label problem, when viewed as a 2s × 2s loss matrix, has rank at most s2+1, and apply a result of Ramaswamy et al. (2014) to design a family of convex calibrated surrogates for the F-measure. The resulting surrogate risk minimization algorithms can be viewed as decomposing the multi-label F-measure learning problem into s2+1 binary class probability estimation problems. We also provide a quantitative regret transfer bound for our surrogates, which allows any regret guarantees for the binary problems to be transferred to regret guarantees for the overall F-measure problem, and discuss a connection with the algorithm of Dembczynski et al. (2013). Our experiments confirm our theoretical findings.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
  2. 2023Ranking with Abstentioncited by 27
  3. 2023In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to Defercited by 26
  4. 2021sigmoidF1: A Smooth F1 Score Surrogate Loss for Multilabel Classificationcited by 23
  5. 2024Multi-Label Learning with Stronger Consistency Guaranteescited by 22
  6. 2024H-Consistency Guarantees for Regressioncited by 21
  7. 2024Enhanced H-Consistency Boundscited by 18
  8. 2022An Embedding Framework for the Design and Analysis of Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 14
  9. 2023Neural Collapse in Multi-label Learning with Pick-all-label Losscited by 14
  10. 2021Rethinking and Reweighting the Univariate Losses for Multi-Label Ranking: Consistency and Generalizationcited by 9
  11. 2025Principled Algorithms for Optimizing Generalized Metrics in Binary Classificationcited by 6
  12. 2023Towards Understanding Generalization of Macro-AUC in Multi-label Learningcited by 4
6 more
  1. 2024Multiclass Learning from Noisy Labels for Non-decomposable Performance Measurescited by 3
  2. 2025Establishing Linear Surrogate Regret Bounds for Convex Smooth Losses via Convolutional Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 2
  3. 2026Exact Rank and Convex Calibration Dimension Lower Bounds for the Multi-Label F1 Losscited by 1
  4. 2024Aligning Multiclass Neural Network Classifier Criterion with Task Performance Metricscited by 0
  5. 2026Principled Algorithms for Optimizing Generalized Metrics in Multi-Label Learningcited by 0
  6. 2026Exponential Convex Calibration Dimension for the Multi-Label Jaccard Measurecited by 0