BAP-MOS: Bandit-Based Adaptive Prompting for Boundary-Sensitive Multi-Organ Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-organ ultrasound segmentation remains challenging when anatomically adjacent structures must be delineated jointly, as localized boundary errors can persist even when Dice scores are high. To address these challenges, we propose Boundary-Adaptive Prompting for Multi-Organ Segmentation (BAP-MOS), a closed-loop adaptive prompting framework. BAP-MOS formulates prompt selection as an organ-specific multi-armed bandit problem over box, point, and combined prompts. An outer Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) loop selects the prompt-selection parameter vector, while an inner UCB-Tuned loop adapts per-organ prompt preferences during fine-tuning using a bounded Dice--MSD--HD95 validation-probe reward. The framework further introduces an organ-scaled negative prompt ring to adapt sparse prompt geometry across anatomical scales, while keeping the image and prompt encoders frozen and updating only the mask decoder. We evaluate BAP-MOS on pooled prostate-region TRUS cohorts against U-Net, nnU-Net, MedSAM, fixed-prompt SAM/MedSAM, and adaptive policy variants. On this benchmark, BAP-MOS achieves Dice 0.982, HD95 0.482, and MSD 0.204, reducing HD95 by approximately 48% and MSD by 45% relative to the strongest conventional baseline. To verify the generalization ability of the framework, we tested it on the external PFUS1 pelvic-floor ultrasound corpus using MedSAM and its adaptive strategy variants, and the results were good. These results support adaptive prompt allocation as an effective mechanism for improving boundary-sensitive multi-organ ultrasound segmentation without modifying the foundation-model backbone. Source Code is available at: https://github.com/SatvikPraveen/BAP-MOS
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
- 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 218
- 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 187
- 2019Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 116
- 2023Computer-Vision Benchmark Segment-Anything Model (SAM) in Medical Images: Accuracy in 12 Datasetscited by 45
- 2023AutoProSAM: Automated Prompting SAM for 3D Multi-Organ Segmentationcited by 19
- 2023Temporally-Extended Prompts Optimization for SAM in Interactive Medical Image Segmentationcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.