mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Corrupting Attention: Evasion-Based Adversarial Attacks on Encoder Attention in Detection Transformers

arXiv 2608.06674 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial vulnerabilities remain a major concern for the safe deployment of neural networks, particularly in object detection, a core task embedded in many safety-critical systems. Detection transformers have emerged as leading object detectors, yet their adversarial robustness remains comparatively underexplored. Most existing attacks target the detection output rather than the attention mechanism that makes these models distinctive. In this paper, we introduce the first attack that directly optimizes an encoder-attention objective under an imperceptible, bounded ℓ_∞ perturbation. Rather than introducing an attacker-owned sink token through a visible patch, it drives the model's own attention toward a corrupted target. We argue that encoder attention concentrates the model's spatial reasoning, so corrupting it propagates through the detection pipeline more disruptively than perturbing the detection output alone. Our attack reduces DETR-R50 mAP on COCO from 42.1 to 0.97, a ~ 4× reduction in resulting mAP over the strongest existing attack under an identical perturbation budget and iteration count. We further show that this vulnerability is not specific to a particular corruption objective: across four qualitatively distinct targets, dispersion, re-ranking, permutation, and peak-suppression, detection consistently drops below 3 mAP, suggesting that the weakness arises from disrupting the attention structure itself rather than from any single target. Finally, we demonstrate that the attack generalizes across attention formulations, reducing DINO-Swin-L from 56.8 to 1.44 mAP against 7.3 for the strongest prior attack, establishing state-of-the-art on both dense and deformable attention.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

30 of 37 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  7. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  8. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  9. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  10. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  12. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
18 more
  1. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  2. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  3. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 691
  4. 2022InternImage: Exploring Large-Scale Vision Foundation Models with Deformable Convolutionscited by 482
  5. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
  6. 2022Focal Modulation Networkscited by 186
  7. 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
  8. 2018Transferable Adversarial Attacks for Image and Video Object Detectioncited by 109
  9. 2021A Survey of Modern Deep Learning based Object Detection Modelscited by 98
  10. 2022A Large-scale Multiple-objective Method for Black-box Attack against Object Detectioncited by 55
  11. 2022Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 49
  12. 2023Lite DETR : An Interleaved Multi-Scale Encoder for Efficient DETRcited by 36
  13. 2018Robust Adversarial Perturbation on Deep Proposal-based Modelscited by 26
  14. 2022Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch Robustnesscited by 23
  15. 2023Ensemble-based Blackbox Attacks on Dense Predictioncited by 16
  16. 2020Relevance Attack on Detectorscited by 8
  17. 2025Adversarial Attention Perturbations for Large Object Detection Transformerscited by 4
  18. 2024Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Detection Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Survey and Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks for Object Detection
  2. 2026AD2: Analysis and Detection of Adversarial Threats in Visual Perception for End-to-End Autonomous Driving Systems
  3. 2024Exploiting Vision Encoder Vulnerabilities for Universal Adversarial Perturbations on Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026PA-Attack: Guiding Gray-Box Attacks on LVLM Vision Encoders with Prototypes and Attention
  5. 2026Seeing No Evil: Blinding Large Vision-Language Models to Safety Instructions via Adversarial Attention Hijacking
  6. 2026Backdoor Mitigation in Object Detection via Adversarial Fine-Tuning
  7. 2026A Survey of Adversarial Efficiency Degradation for Vision Transformer by Exploiting Input-adaptive Optimization
  8. 2026Detecting Adversarial Images through Response Profiles of Vision-Language Models