Effective pruning of task-trained recurrent neural networks using noisy fluctuations and connection rescaling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The pruning of network connections is key to brain function but, despite its importance, there exist few biologically-plausible pruning rules with demonstrated good performance. In this work we evaluate noise-prune, a recently introduced unsupervised local pruning rule for recurrent networks that uses noisy fluctuations to determine the importance of connections. Noise-prune has previously only been empirically tested on random networks without a specific computational function. We show that noise-prune preserves task-performance in task-trained recurrent neural networks, greatly outperforming a strategy that only uses the magnitude of connections and performing on par with or exceeding a non-local strategy that uses second-order information. Rather than deterministically removing connections that fall below a certain threshold importance, noise-prune samples connections to preserve based on their importance and strengthens retained connections to preserve average synaptic strength. We show that this sampling and rescaling is essential to good performance, but that the optimal empirical degree of rescaling is lower than that predicted by the original theoretical argument. Our work thus validates noise-prune as a biologically-plausible pruning rule for functional recurrent network architectures and characterizes its optimal parameter settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 34 references.
References · 15
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
- 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
- 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 221
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 202
- 2017Deep Rewiring: Training very sparse deep networkscited by 139
- 2017Exploring Sparsity in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2018Eligibility Traces and Plasticity on Behavioral Time Scales: Experimental Support of neoHebbian Three-Factor Learning Rulescited by 67
- 2018Data-Dependent Coresets for Compressing Neural Networks with Applications to Generalization Boundscited by 43
- 2020Artificial neural networks for neuroscientists: A primercited by 26
3 more
- 2022Winning the lottery with neural connectivity constraints: faster learning across cognitive tasks with spatially constrained sparse RNNscited by 10
- 2022Developmental Plasticity-inspired Adaptive Pruning for Deep Spiking and Artificial Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2020Using noise to probe recurrent neural network structure and prune synapsescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.