mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Using noise to probe recurrent neural network structure and prune synapses

arXiv 2011.07334 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2020q-bio.NC cs.NEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many networks in the brain are sparsely connected, and the brain eliminates synapses during development and learning. How could the brain decide which synapses to prune? In a recurrent network, determining the importance of a synapse between two neurons is a difficult computational problem, depending on the role that both neurons play and on all possible pathways of information flow between them. Noise is ubiquitous in neural systems, and often considered an irritant to be overcome. Here we suggest that noise could play a functional role in synaptic pruning, allowing the brain to probe network structure and determine which synapses are redundant. We construct a simple, local, unsupervised plasticity rule that either strengthens or prunes synapses using only synaptic weight and the noise-driven covariance of the neighboring neurons. For a subset of linear and rectified-linear networks, we prove that this rule preserves the spectrum of the original matrix and hence preserves network dynamics even when the fraction of pruned synapses asymptotically approaches 1. The plasticity rule is biologically-plausible and may suggest a new role for noise in neural computation.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.