Optimal Scalarizations for Sublinear Hypervolume Regret
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scalarization is a general, parallizable technique that can be deployed in any multiobjective setting to reduce multiple objectives into one, yet some have dismissed this versatile approach because linear scalarizations cannot explore concave regions of the Pareto frontier. To that end, we aim to find simple non-linear scalarizations that provably explore a diverse set of k objectives on the Pareto frontier, as measured by the dominated hypervolume. We show that hypervolume scalarizations with uniformly random weights achieves an optimal sublinear hypervolume regret bound of O(T-1/k), with matching lower bounds that preclude any algorithm from doing better asymptotically. For the setting of multiobjective stochastic linear bandits, we utilize properties of hypervolume scalarizations to derive a novel non-Euclidean analysis to get regret bounds of tildeO( d T-1/2 + T-1/k), removing unnecessary poly(k) dependencies. We support our theory with strong empirical performance of using non-linear scalarizations that outperforms both their linear counterparts and other standard multiobjective algorithms in a variety of natural settings.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2023.
Builds on
12 of 45 references.
References · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 242
- 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
- 2020Differentiable Expected Hypervolume Improvement for Parallel Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 179
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
- 2018A Flexible Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization using Random Scalarizationscited by 99
- 2020Random Hypervolume Scalarizations for Provable Multi-Objective Black Box Optimizationcited by 60
- 2017Multi-objective Bandits: Optimizing the Generalized Gini Indexcited by 28
- 2019Multi-Objective Generalized Linear Banditscited by 19
- 2013Adaptive Metric Dimensionality Reductioncited by 14
- 2016Using Well-Understood Single-Objective Functions in Multiobjective Black-Box Optimization Test Suitescited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2024The Vizier Gaussian Process Bandit Algorithmcited by 14
- 2026Cost-Aware Multi-Objective Bandits: Theory and Application to Budgeted LLM Configuration Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025Thompson Sampling for Multi-Objective Linear Contextual Banditcited by 2
- 2026Efficient Online Lexicographic Generalized Low-Rank Matrix Banditscited by 2
- 2026Top-k Pareto Bandits: Hypervolume Regret for Multi-Objective Slate Selectioncited by 0
- 2026Converge Then Diversify: Decoupling Convergence and Diversity in Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisationcited by 0
- 2026Few-for-Many Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Objective Banditscited by 0
- 2026Few-for-Many Best-Arm Identification in Multi-Objective Bandits12 Oct 2026
- 2026Converge Then Diversify: Decoupling Convergence and Diversity in Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimisation11 Sep 2026
- 2026Cost-Aware Multi-Objective Bandits: Theory and Application to Budgeted LLM Configuration Evaluation5 Aug 2026
- 2026Efficient Online Lexicographic Generalized Low-Rank Matrix Bandits5 Aug 2026
- 2026Top-k Pareto Bandits: Hypervolume Regret for Multi-Objective Slate Selection28 Jul 2026
- 2025Thompson Sampling for Multi-Objective Linear Contextual Bandit30 Nov 2025
- 2024The Vizier Gaussian Process Bandit Algorithm21 Aug 2024