Robust Conformal Outlier Detection under Contaminated Reference Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conformal prediction is a flexible framework for calibrating machine learning predictions, providing distribution-free statistical guarantees. In outlier detection, this calibration relies on a reference set of labeled inlier data to control the type-I error rate. However, obtaining a perfectly labeled inlier reference set is often unrealistic, and a more practical scenario involves access to a contaminated reference set containing a small fraction of outliers. This paper analyzes the impact of such contamination on the validity of conformal methods. We prove that under realistic, non-adversarial settings, calibration on contaminated data yields conservative type-I error control, shedding light on the inherent robustness of conformal methods. This conservativeness, however, typically results in a loss of power. To alleviate this limitation, we propose a novel, active data-cleaning framework that leverages a limited labeling budget and an outlier detection model to selectively annotate data points in the contaminated reference set that are suspected as outliers. By removing only the annotated outliers in this ``suspicious'' subset, we can effectively enhance power while mitigating the risk of inflating the type-I error rate, as supported by our theoretical analysis. Experiments on real datasets validate the conservative behavior of conformal methods under contamination and show that the proposed data-cleaning strategy improves power without sacrificing validity.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 7.
12 papers.
- 2025General Synthetic-Powered Inferencecited by 5
- 2025Conformal Prediction with Corrupted Labels: Uncertain Imputation and Robust Re-weightingcited by 3
- 2025Model-agnostic Selective Labeling with Provable Statistical Guaranteescited by 2
- 2025Conformal Data Contamination Tests for In-distribution Data Acquisitioncited by 1
- 2026Synthetic-Powered Multiple Testing with FDR Controlcited by 1
- 2025Online Conformal Anomaly Detection with Prediction-Powered Data Acquisitioncited by 0
- 2026Elements of Conformal Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Conformal Robust Set Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Conformal calibration and look-elsewhere effect in anomaly detection for new-physics searchescited by 0
- 2026Self-Poisoning in Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sharp-Threshold Theory and Certified Label-Free Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026When Modalities Fail to Tango: Conformal Backdoor Detection in Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 0
- 2026When Identical Rows Disagree: From Benchmark Identifiability to Replication-Robust Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
- 2026When Identical Rows Disagree: From Benchmark Identifiability to Replication-Robust Anomaly Detection27 Aug 2026
- 2026When Modalities Fail to Tango: Conformal Backdoor Detection in Multimodal Contrastive Learning4 Aug 2026
- 2026Self-Poisoning in Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sharp-Threshold Theory and Certified Label-Free Calibration23 Jul 2026
- 2026Conformal calibration and look-elsewhere effect in anomaly detection for new-physics searches11 Jun 2026
- 2026Conformal Robust Set Estimation20 Apr 2026
- 2026Elements of Conformal Prediction25 Mar 2026
- 2026Synthetic-Powered Multiple Testing with FDR Control18 Feb 2026
- 2025Model-agnostic Selective Labeling with Provable Statistical Guarantees16 Oct 2025
- 2025General Synthetic-Powered Inference24 Sep 2025
- 2025Conformal Data Contamination Tests for In-distribution Data Acquisition18 Jul 2025
- 2025Conformal Prediction with Corrupted Labels: Uncertain Imputation and Robust Re-weighting7 May 2025
- 2025Online Conformal Anomaly Detection with Prediction-Powered Data Acquisition3 May 2025