Perceptual Anchoring: Prototype-Guided Text Calibration for Training-free Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training-free open-vocabulary semantic segmentation (OVSS) partitions an image into semantically distinct regions based on arbitrary text descriptions, without learning any additional parameters. However, existing methods typically focus on improving visual representations while treating text embeddings that encode only generic category concepts as fixed classification references. The resulting semantic gap between these generic concepts and the visual representations that capture the specific appearances of target instances often causes incomplete masks and erroneous predictions in non-target regions. Inspired by the symbol-percept correspondence underlying perceptual anchoring, we propose Prototype-Guided Text Calibration (PTC) for training-free OVSS. In the Perceiving stage, PTC selects reliable visual evidence based on initial matching scores to construct category-specific visual prototypes. In the Anchoring stage, PTC uses these prototypes to calibrate their corresponding text embeddings, with the calibration strength adaptively adjusted based on the amount of visual evidence. Consequently, the calibrated text embeddings align more accurately with instance-specific visual representations while preserving generic category semantics and open-vocabulary generalization. Moreover, PTC requires neither additional training nor external models and can serve as a plug-and-play module for existing methods. Extensive experiments across eight benchmarks show that PTC significantly enhances the performance of six representative methods and yields more complete and accurate segmentation results. These results validate PTC as a simple and effective approach to improving visual-text alignment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
43 of 56 references.
References · 43
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
31 more
- 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 583
- 2022GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervisioncited by 531
- 2022SegNeXt: Rethinking Convolutional Attention Design for Semantic Segmentationcited by 252
- 2021Decoupling Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentationcited by 199
- 2023SCLIP: Rethinking Self-Attention for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 170
- 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
- 2023CLIPSelf: Vision Transformer Distills Itself for Open-Vocabulary Dense Predictioncited by 118
- 2022ReCo: Retrieve and Co-segment for Zero-shot Transfercited by 117
- 2024ClearCLIP: Decomposing CLIP Representations for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 113
- 2024ProxyCLIP: Proxy Attention Improves CLIP for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 111
- 2023A Closer Look at the Explainability of Contrastive Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 96
- 2023Grounding Everything: Emerging Localization Properties in Vision-Language Transformerscited by 91
- 2022Perceptual Grouping in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 82
- 2024Pay Attention to Your Neighbours: Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
- 2023CLIP as RNN: Segment Countless Visual Concepts without Training Endeavorcited by 69
- 2023Diffusion Models for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 64
- 2024Explore the Potential of CLIP for Training-Free Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 61
- 2023Learning Mask-aware CLIP Representations for Zero-Shot Segmentationcited by 57
- 2024Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentation with Offline Diffusion-Augmented Prototype Generationcited by 44
- 2024Collaborative Vision-Text Representation Optimizing for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 41
- 2023Global Knowledge Calibration for Fast Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 40
- 2024Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for High-Performance, Training-Free Open Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 39
- 2024In Defense of Lazy Visual Grounding for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 38
- 2024CorrCLIP: Reconstructing Patch Correlations in CLIP for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 34
- 2024ResCLIP: Residual Attention for Training-free Dense Vision-language Inferencecited by 29
- 2023Rewrite Caption Semantics: Bridging Semantic Gaps for Language-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 21
- 2023Zero-guidance Segmentation Using Zero Segment Labelscited by 18
- 2024Image-to-Image Matching via Foundation Models: A New Perspective for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 15
- 2025Training-Free Class Purification for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 9
- 2024Training-Free Semantic Segmentation via LLM-Supervisioncited by 8
- 2024ITACLIP: Boosting Training-Free Semantic Segmentation with Image, Text, and Architectural Enhancementscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.