Cross-Layer Interaction under Weight-Space Ablation: A Closed-Form Attention Jacobian Bound and a Test on a Real Pretrained Model
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis
Abstract (arXiv)
A companion paper studies when activation patching and weight-space ablation agree, inside an idealized model where a conditional computation is carried additively through a residual stream. For the one composition in that model where two carriers are architecturally dependent, an attention head and its own layer's normalization-MLP composition, it derives an exact first-order interaction formula, zero when only the MLP is ablated and second-order bounded when the head is also ablated. That result is confined to a single residual block and checked only on small transformers on a synthetic task. This paper extends the result past both limits. First, the interaction from ablating carriers spanning several layers decomposes exactly into same-block terms, one per touched layer, plus a cross-layer remainder on which the decomposition makes no claim of smallness. Second, we isolate that remainder exactly, for two layers, as a double integral of a mixed second derivative, and name the missing ingredient needed to bound it: a Jacobian bound for the attention sub-block. We derive this bound in closed form and verify it, without a single violation, against Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct's real weights, though we do not yet chain it across layers. We also give, in closed form, the curvature constant the companion paper's bound leaves unexhibited. Third, on that same model, we search for and find an emergent circuit for indirect object identification, never designed into it, using the original activation-patching method for this task, and test collapse, dissociation, and interaction on it. The result is mixed: a shared carrier emerges across all five tested instances, collapse and dissociation hold on most but not all, and a nonzero interaction is measurable on three of five, at layer pairs outside the same-block case the companion theorem covers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 9 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Conditional Co-Ablation: Recovering Self-Repair Backups in Transformer Circuits2 Jul
- 2026The Curse of Multiple Mediators: Hidden Interaction Effects in Activation Patching25 Jun
- 2026Beyond Importance: Interchange-Sobol Sensitivity Reveals Task-Specific Content Channels in Transformer Components12 Jun
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small1 Nov
Other references · 2
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 156
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Activation-Space Order-Swap Geometry: A Site-Asymmetry Audit26 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Models
- 2026A Theory of Conditional Collapse under Low-Rank Weight-Space Ablations: I. The Single-Block Theory and Synthetic Validation
- 2026Spectral Probe-Circuits: A Three-Step Recipe for Identifying Attention-Head Circuits in Pretrained Transformers
- 2025Debiasing Diffusion Priors via 3D Attention for Consistent Gaussian Splatting
- 2026Borrowed Geometry: Cross-Distribution Head-Importance Fingerprints of Frozen Pretrained Gemma 4 31B
- 2026Understanding Sparse Attention Selectivity in Long-Context Foundation Models via Counterfactual Evaluation
- 2026Pattern Selectivity is Not Task-Causal Structure: A Cross-Architecture Mechanistic Study of Composed-Task Circuits in 1B-Class Language Models
- 2025Causal Head Gating: A Framework for Interpreting Roles of Attention Heads in Transformers