mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Borrowed Geometry: Cross-Distribution Head-Importance Fingerprints of Frozen Pretrained Gemma 4 31B

arXiv 2605.00333 ↗First posted 1 May 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Frozen Gemma 4 31B weights pretrained exclusively on text, unmodified, transfer through a thin trainable interface to non-text modalities the substrate has never processed. On the L24--L29 slice (192 attention heads), an English-text TxtCopy attention probe (95 sentences) and per-head ablation impact on four non-language token-pattern tasks (binary copy, associative recall, 1D cellular automaton Rule 90, binary addition) jointly classify four heads -- L26.28, L27.28, L27.2, L27.3 -- as top-tier on both signals. The slice-level joint coincidence is significant under hypergeometric null (P = 0.0013, N=192, K=38, n=4) and survives multiplicity-aware permutation tests (PV4 = 0.013). Pretrained Gemma L26 reaches 60.22% on OGBench cube-double-play-task1 vs ~1% for random-init Gemma (+59pt at n=3); a FrozenRandom-GPT2 control with correct 1/√dk scaling also fails. Head-level causal validation: zeroing L26.28 in the trained cube-task1 IQL agent drops success 63.3% → 10.0% vs 46.7% for a layer-matched low-TxtCopy negative control (3.2× specificity at n=30; n=5 paired-t p=0.039). A full L26 sweep places L26.28 at rank 4 of 32. Honest negatives: within-L26 Spearman ρ(TxtCopy, drop) = +0.37 (opposite of within-layer causal reading); single-head activation patching does not transfer the matching variable; the 4 named heads alone do not suffice on any task; Walker2d-DT and scene-task1 recruit L24 outside the named slice and show null head-ablation specificity. We frame the contribution as a cross-distribution importance fingerprint at the slice level plus head-level causal evidence on one cross-modality target.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  3. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  5. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
  6. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
  7. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  8. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  9. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  10. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  11. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  12. 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 303
5 more
  1. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 238
  2. 2021Pretrained Transformers as Universal Computation Enginescited by 162
  3. 2025Knowledge Insulating Vision-Language-Action Models: Train Fast, Run Fast, Generalize Bettercited by 146
  4. 2016Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?cited by 100
  5. 2014An exact mapping between the Variational Renormalization Group and Deep Learningcited by 56

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Linear Predictability of Attention Heads in Large Language Models
  2. 2025ZeroTuning: Unlocking the Initial Token's Power to Enhance Large Language Models Without Training
  3. 2026Pattern Selectivity is Not Task-Causal Structure: A Cross-Architecture Mechanistic Study of Composed-Task Circuits in 1B-Class Language Models
  4. 2025Head Pursuit: Probing Attention Specialization in Multimodal Transformers
  5. 2026Memory Retrieval in Transformers: Insights from The Encoding Specificity Principle
  6. 2026Where Computation Lives Inside TabPFN: Causal Localisation of Attention Head Function
  7. 2026Positional versus Symbolic Attention Heads: Learning Dynamics, RoPE Geometry, and Length Generalization
  8. 2026Single-Position Intervention Fails: Distributed Output Templates Drive In-Context Learning