mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Curse of Multiple Mediators: Hidden Interaction Effects in Activation Patching

arXiv 2606.27510 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Circuits and mechanistic analysis

Abstract (arXiv)

Activation patching is the primary tool in mechanistic interpretability. It attributes causal responsibility for a model behavior to each of its individual components by estimating its natural indirect effect (NIE). Re-deriving the activation patching estimand from causal mediation analysis, we find that the NIE does not solely capture the causal effect through the specific component. It also contains interaction effects (INT) that measure how much the component's causal effect itself depends on the state of other components in the model. A natural response may be to try to eliminate INT by adjusting the estimator or unit of analysis, but each of these potential remedies has predictable failure modes. We demonstrate these failure modes in the GPT-2 IOI circuit; components whose causal importance is conditional on the state of other components are either invisible or artificially inflated, and INT variance explains the previously documented instability of faithfulness scores. We prove that INT scales with the distance between clean and patched component activations, is negligible when the model is locally affine, and decomposes combinatorially into pairwise and higher-order group interactions. Despite its inevitability, INT is not a nuisance to be eliminated, but rather a diagnostic for interpretability studies. Its individual and group-level magnitude and sign signal when causal conclusions are prompt-dependent, and when greedy NIE-based component ranking will miss mechanisms only discoverable through combinatorial search.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability as Statistical Estimation: A Variance Analysis1 Oct
  2. 2025MIB: A Mechanistic Interpretability Benchmark17 Apr
  3. 2024Hypothesis Testing the Circuit Hypothesis in LLMs16 Oct
  4. 2024The Quest for the Right Mediator: Surveying Mechanistic Interpretability Through the Lens of Causal Mediation Analysis2 Aug
  5. 2024InterpBench: Semi-Synthetic Transformers for Evaluating Mechanistic Interpretability Techniques19 Jul
  6. 2023Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discovery16 Oct
  7. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability28 Apr
  8. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small1 Nov

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  2. 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
  3. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  4. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
  5. 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
  6. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 202
  7. 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 195
  8. 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 149
  9. 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
  10. 2025SAEs Are Good for Steering -- If You Select the Right Featurescited by 78
  11. 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 63
  12. 2024Missed Causes and Ambiguous Effects: Counterfactuals Pose Challenges for Interpreting Neural Networkscited by 23
4 more
  1. 2025Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretabilitycited by 16
  2. 2026The Shape of Beliefs: Geometry, Dynamics, and Interventions along Representation Manifolds of Language Models' Posteriorscited by 15
  3. 2020Insights into the "cross-world" independence assumption of causal mediation analysiscited by 7
  4. 2026Pitfalls in Evaluating Interpretability Agentscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Attribution Patching Lies: Diagnosis and a Second-Order Correction
  2. 2026Every Component Is a Lookup: One Linear Graph for Interaction, Composition and Attribution
  3. 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalise
  4. 2026Capacity, Responsiveness and Alignment: What Makes a Latent Structure Actionable
  5. 2026Patch-Effect Graph Kernels for LLM Interpretability
  6. 2025Addressing divergent representations from causal interventions on neural networks
  7. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methods
  8. 2026Bypassing the Rationale: Causal Auditing of Implicit Reasoning in Language Models