From Routes to Steps: Separating Semantic Progress from Local Execution in Vision-and-Language Navigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to follow a route-level instruction by executing its constituent steps from egocentric visual observations. Existing VLM-based navigators typically supervise both capabilities through next-action prediction alone, making progress-tracking errors difficult to distinguish from execution errors. When an agent deviates from the route, a corrective action label may recover the next movement but does not indicate whether the agent selected the wrong sub-instruction or failed to execute the correct one. Consequently, the agent may continue making decisions from an erroneous progress state. To resolve this ambiguity, we propose Route2Step, a framework that decouples semantic progress tracking from action generation through an explicit step-level interface. The Instruction Analysis Module (MIA) predicts this state from the global instruction and visual history. Conditioned on the predicted state and recent observations, the Action Generation Module (MAG) generates local action chunks. To supervise the progress state without manual temporal labels, E-SPA, a step-alignment procedure, associates sub-instructions with their corresponding portions of route-level demonstrations. These alignments enable state supervision for incorrect progress estimates, while direct action supervision is reserved for rollout groups that repeatedly fail under the correct active sub-instruction. On R2R-CE, Route2Step improves SR from 48.1% to 55.3% and SPL from 43.3% to 48.2%, using 190K state-level corrective samples while requiring only 11.5K directly action-supervised states. Experiments in real-world indoor and outdoor environments further demonstrate the practical applicability of Route2Step. The project page is: https://sisyphus-hxy.github.io/Route2Step/.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 23 references.
References · 15
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,376
- 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,191
- 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 441
- 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 414
- 2024NaVILA: Legged Robot Vision-Language-Action Model for Navigationcited by 211
- 2019Self-Monitoring Navigation Agent via Auxiliary Progress Estimationcited by 176
- 2025StreamVLN: Streaming Vision-and-Language Navigation via SlowFast Context Modelingcited by 118
- 2019The Regretful Agent: Heuristic-Aided Navigation through Progress Estimationcited by 105
- 2019General Evaluation for Instruction Conditioned Navigation using Dynamic Time Warpingcited by 105
- 2020Sub-Instruction Aware Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 66
- 2025CorrectNav: Self-Correction Flywheel Empowers Vision-Language-Action Navigation Modelcited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Progress-Think: Semantic Progress Reasoning for Vision-Language Navigation
- 2026Robust Vision-Language Navigation with Awareness of Instruction-Execution Progress
- 2026Seek Before You Move: Evidence Seeking for Progress Grounding in Vision-Language Navigation
- 2026Dual-Anchoring: Addressing State Drift in Vision-Language Navigation
- 2026HarnessVLN: Unifying Training-Free Embodied Navigation through an Agent Harness
- 2026What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior
- 2026ReflectVLN: Training Vision-Language Navigation Agents with Reflective Reasoning
- 2026Beyond Waypoints: A Trajectory-Centric Waypointing Paradigm for Vision-Language Navigation