mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Getting the Parameters Right: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark and Probe-Guided Training for LLM Tool Calls

arXiv 2608.03071 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model agents derive much of their capability from tool use. Existing research on tool use has largely focused on selecting the right tool and orchestrating the order of calls. However, correctly filling the parameters of a tool call is equally critical for successful execution and has received far less attention. In domains such as cloud networking, even frontier models correctly complete fewer than half of tool calls. Inspired by recent analyses showing that LLM hidden states encode rich information about model predictions, we discover that while the model generates a parameter value, its hidden state contains a strong correctness signal: a simple linear probe can accurately predict whether the value will be correct. Based on this observation, we propose a unified probe-guided framework with two complementary approaches: probe-filtered bootstrapped training (PBT), which uses the probe to filter reliable self-generated calls for fine-tuning, and probe-guided reranking (PGR), which uses the probe to select better candidates during inference. To support systematic evaluation, we release ParamBench, a benchmark built from real cloud-network APIs that categorizes every instance into five difficulty levels according to parameter nesting depth, cross-parameter dependencies, and the reasoning required to derive values from earlier calls. Extensive experiments across 5 open models on ParamBench and 6 external benchmarks demonstrate that our method substantially improves parameter generation, raising the average exact match from 19.7% to 59.6%.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

19 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling2 Sep
  2. 2024APIGen: Automated Pipeline for Generating Verifiable and Diverse Function-Calling Datasets26 Jun
  3. 2024Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmark14 May
  4. 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use4 Oct
  5. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs24 May
  6. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs14 Apr

Other references · 13

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  3. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  4. 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
  5. 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
  6. 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 230
  7. 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 170
  8. 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 158
  9. 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 154
  10. 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 96
  11. 2023On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answeringcited by 54
  12. 2024Re-Invoke: Tool Invocation Rewriting for Zero-Shot Tool Retrievalcited by 50
1 more
  1. 2026Internal Representations as Indicators of Hallucinations in Agent Tool Selectioncited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Try, Check and Retry: A Divide-and-Conquer Framework for Boosting Long-context Tool-Calling Performance of LLMs
  2. 2026The Calls are Coming from Inside the Model: Investigating Probe-based Detection of Tool-Calling Errors in LLMs
  3. 2026Toolcompass: Guiding Tool Trialing, Not Suppressing It
  4. 2024Learning to Ask: When LLM Agents Meet Unclear Instruction
  5. 2026ToolMenuBench: Benchmarking Tool-Menu Filtering Strategies for Reliable and Efficient LLM Agents
  6. 2026ToolFailBench: Diagnosing Tool-Use Failures in LLM Agents
  7. 2025AskToAct: Enhancing LLMs Tool Use via Self-Correcting Clarification
  8. 2026ToolRobustBench: Stage-Wise Perturbation Evaluation and Failure Diagnosis for Tool-Calling Agents