PACE: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Time-Efficient Embodied Planning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning-enhanced large language models have achieved remarkable improvements in planning tasks, yet their deployment in embodied systems remains impractical due to prohibitive inference delays-often exceeding minutes per planning instance. The fundamental bottleneck stems from the serial nature of existing paradigms: models must complete all reasoning before any action execution, leaving execution time windows entirely unexploited. We introduce PACE (Planning with Adaptive Cognitive Effort), a framework that enables interleaved reasoning and execution through two key innovations: an Interleaved Think-Act architecture that pipelines cognitive processing with action execution, and a Dynamic Budget Allocator that adapts reasoning token budgets to available execution time windows. On the Robotouille benchmark using Qwen3-8B-AWQ, PACE achieves a 10% success rate-representing a 67% improvement over the ReAct+Think baseline-while delivering 6.9 times acceleration in thinking time compared to unconstrained reasoning. The framework hides 66.8% of thinking time within execution windows, demonstrating that strategic cognitive effort allocation can simultaneously improve both planning quality and time efficiency. These results provide evidence that time-aware architectural innovations enable reasoning models to operate in latency-sensitive embodied domains where they were previously impractical.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
12 of 34 references.
References · 12
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
- 2024Token-Budget-Aware LLM Reasoningcited by 242
- 2018PDDLStream: Integrating Symbolic Planners and Blackbox Samplers via Optimistic Adaptive Planningcited by 147
- 2023Compositional Foundation Models for Hierarchical Planningcited by 92
- 2025Robotouille: An Asynchronous Planning Benchmark for LLM Agentscited by 31
- 2020Adaptively Informed Trees (AIT*): Fast Asymptotically Optimal Path Planning through Adaptive Heuristicscited by 20
- 2020Adaptive Informative Path Planning with Multimodal Sensingcited by 7
- 2026Draft-Thinking: Learning Efficient Reasoning in Long Chain-of-Thought LLMscited by 3
- 2023Language Cognition and Language Computation -- Human and Machine Language Understandingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Fast-ThinkAct: Efficient Vision-Language-Action Reasoning via Verbalizable Latent Planning
- 2026Embodied Task Planning via Graph-Informed Action Generation with Large Language Models
- 2026ParallelWorld: Test-Time Scaling for Embodied Reasoning
- 2026From Assumptions to Actions: Turning LLM Reasoning into Uncertainty-Aware Planning for Embodied Agents
- 2023Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoning
- 2026DIRECT: When and Where Should You Allocate Test-Time Compute in Embodied Planners?
- 2026RPMS: Enhancing LLM-Based Embodied Planning through Rule-Augmented Memory Synergy
- 2026When Should a Robot Think? Resource-Aware Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Embodied Robotic Decision-Making