When Should a Robot Think? Resource-Aware Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Embodied Robotic Decision-Making
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Embodied robotic systems increasingly rely on large language model (LLM)-based agents to support high-level reasoning, planning, and decision-making during interactions with the environment. However, invoking LLM reasoning introduces substantial computational latency and resource overhead, which can interrupt action execution and reduce system reliability. Excessive reasoning may delay actions, while insufficient reasoning often leads to incorrect decisions and task failures. This raises a fundamental question for embodied agents: when should the agent reason, and when should it act? In this work, we propose RARRL (Resource-Aware Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning), a hierarchical framework for resource-aware orchestration of embodied agents. Rather than learning low-level control policies, RARRL learns a high-level orchestration policy that operates at the agent's decision-making layer. This policy enables the agent to adaptively determine whether to invoke reasoning, which reasoning role to employ, and how much computational budget to allocate based on current observations, execution history, and remaining resources. Extensive experiments, including evaluations with empirical latency profiles derived from the ALFRED benchmark, show that RARRL consistently improves task success rates while reducing execution latency and enhancing robustness compared with fixed or heuristic reasoning strategies. These results demonstrate that adaptive reasoning control is essential for building reliable and efficient embodied robotic agents.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 291
- 2024Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Makingcited by 142
- 2024AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agentscited by 110
- 2024Large Language Models for Robotics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectivescited by 88
17 more
- 2023Towards End-to-End Embodied Decision Making via Multi-modal Large Language Model: Explorations with GPT4-Vision and Beyondcited by 50
- 2022Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2025RCR-Router: Efficient Role-Aware Context Routing for Multi-Agent LLM Systems with Structured Memorycited by 24
- 2025Grounding Multimodal LLMs to Embodied Agents that Ask for Help with Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2025Harmony in Divergence: Towards Fast, Accurate, and Memory-efficient Zeroth-order LLM Fine-tuningcited by 17
- 2025xRouter: Training Cost-Aware LLMs Orchestration System via Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
- 2024OPEx: A Component-Wise Analysis of LLM-Centric Agents in Embodied Instruction Followingcited by 14
- 2024Toward Adaptive Large Language Models Structured Pruning via Hybrid-grained Weight Importance Assessmentcited by 13
- 2025Structured Agent Distillation for Large Language Modelcited by 11
- 2025From Efficiency to Adaptivity: A Deeper Look at Adaptive Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2022AdaLoGN: Adaptive Logic Graph Network for Reasoning-Based Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 8
- 2022Resource-Aware Distributed Submodular Maximization: A Paradigm for Multi-Robot Decision-Makingcited by 6
- 2021Resource and Response Aware Path Planning for Long-term Autonomy of Ground Robots in Agriculturecited by 3
- 2021Energy-Efficient Mobile Robot Control via Run-time Monitoring of Environmental Complexity and Computing Workloadcited by 3
- 2023Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendationscited by 3
- 2025TSLA: A Task-Specific Learning Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation on Autonomous Vehicles Platformcited by 1
- 2026Roots Beneath the Cut: Uncovering the Risk of Concept Revival in Pruning-Based Unlearning for Diffusion Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Think, Act, Learn: A Framework for Autonomous Robotic Agents using Closed-Loop Large Language Models
- 2026From Assumptions to Actions: Turning LLM Reasoning into Uncertainty-Aware Planning for Embodied Agents
- 2026On-Device Robotic Planning: Eliminating Inference Redundancy for Efficient Decision-Making ↗
- 2025Robot-R1: Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Embodied Reasoning in Robotics
- 2026One Word, Different Action: A Real-Robot Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Embodied Reasoning ↗
- 2026Capek 0.5: An Execution-Centric Vision-Language Model for Embodied Intelligence
- 2025Reinforced Reasoning for Embodied Planning
- 2026RoboAgent: Chaining Basic Capabilities for Embodied Task Planning