CAPEval: A Decoupled Caption Evaluation across Understanding and Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Captions serve as a primary supervision signal for both multimodal understanding and text-to-image generation. However, previous evaluations treat the caption quality as a single scalar objective, which conflates two distinct properties: (1) how much visual information a caption covers and (2) how reliably the image supports its stated claims. To this end, we design a decoupled caption evaluation benchmark, CAPEval (Coverage And Precision Evaluation), with human-written ground-truth captions and human-verified atomic checklist items. Specifically, CAPEval decomposes caption quality into Coverage and Precision. The former quantifies how thoroughly a caption covers ground-truth factual content, while the latter reflects the factual correctness rate of all claims expressed in the caption. We select 10 captioners and further conduct controlled downstream end-to-end experiments with them from four model families, where the caption source is the only variable. Empirically, we find a consistent task-dependent dissociation: Coverage serves as the stronger correlate for understanding performance, whereas Precision acts as the dominant predictor for generation performance. This decoupled evaluation paradigm not only delivers a more fine-grained diagnosis of caption quality, but also offers actionable guidance for selecting and optimizing captioners tailored to different downstream tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 71 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
71 of 79 references.
References · 71
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
38 more
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,510
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
- 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
- 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,005
- 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
- 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 940
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
- 2024Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMscited by 838
- 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 804
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
- 2023CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 708
- 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 644
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 476
- 2024ELLA: Equip Diffusion Models with LLM for Enhanced Semantic Alignmentcited by 475
- 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
- 2018nocaps: novel object captioning at scalecited by 444
- 2020TextCaps: a Dataset for Image Captioning with Reading Comprehensioncited by 400
- 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 300
- 2023T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Generationcited by 260
- 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 244
- 2024DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Imagescited by 132
- 2025LongCat-Image Technical Reportcited by 100
- 2024Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Captioncited by 81
- 2025VGR: Visual Grounded Reasoningcited by 73
50 most cited of 71 All 71 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.