mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ET-Prune: Evidence-Aware Dynamic Budgeting for Visual Token Pruning in Text-Rich MLLMs

arXiv 2608.01979 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of multimodal large language models, but a fixed token ratio is poorly matched to text-rich inputs. In OCR-centric tasks, decisive evidence can be a small number, label, or field whose relevance is specified by the question; indiscriminate pruning can erase that evidence while retaining visually salient but irrelevant regions. We present ET-Prune, a training-free framework that casts pruning as evidence allocation. It derives question-conditioned evidence from a decoder-side partial query-key block, safeguards text-like spatial regions, and converts evidence uncertainty and density into a sample-specific token floor. Three progressive middle-layer events then move the sequence toward this budget, retaining more tokens for diffuse or text-dense evidence and pruning concentrated evidence more aggressively. At the observed point estimates from one deterministic pass per configuration, ET-Prune leads or ties among pruned methods in all six backbone-benchmark comparisons at roughly half tokens. On OCRBench-v2, it leads the strongest pruned baselines by 1.80 and 0.68 percentage points on Qwen3-VL-8B and InternVL3.5-8B, respectively, while retaining about half of the visual tokens; on MMBench v1.1, it reaches 0.8467 circular exact-matching accuracy versus 0.8437 for Vanilla at 54.45% average visual-token retention. These results show a favorable observed quality-cost trade-off for evidence-aware dynamic budgeting in text-rich multimodal inference.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026IVC-Prune: Revealing the Implicit Visual Coordinates in LVLMs for Vision Token Pruning3 Feb
  2. 2024PyramidDrop: Accelerating Your Large Vision-Language Models via Pyramid Visual Redundancy Reduction22 Oct

Other references · 14

  1. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  2. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  3. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  4. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
  5. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  6. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 849
  7. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  8. 2023Monkey: Image Resolution and Text Label Are Important Things for Large Multi-modal Modelscited by 356
  9. 2024mPLUG-DocOwl 1.5: Unified Structure Learning for OCR-free Document Understandingcited by 220
  10. 2017BlockDrop: Dynamic Inference Paths in Residual Networkscited by 185
  11. 2024OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoningcited by 165
  12. 2024ChemVLM: Exploring the Power of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry Areacited by 68
2 more
  1. 2025Token Reduction Should Go Beyond Efficiency in Generative Models -- From Vision, Language to Multimodalitycited by 49
  2. 2026G2TR: Generation-Guided Visual Token Reduction for Separate-Encoder Unified Multimodal Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026OccamToken: Efficient VLM Inference with Training-Free and Budget-Adaptive Token Pruning
  2. 2026Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Spatial Provenance in Visual Token Pruning for OCR-Critical MLLM Inference
  3. 2026E2S-Pruner: Progressive Two-Stage Evidence Fusion for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026SinkPruner: Sink-Free Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  5. 2026S2Prune: Spatially Structured Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2026IDPruner: Harmonizing Importance and Diversity in Visual Token Pruning for MLLMs
  7. 2026TOPS: First-Principles Visual Token Pruning via Constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets for Efficient MLLM Inference
  8. 2026QCPruner: Query-Conditioned Population Coverage for Visual Token Pruning