Computing with Agentic Oracles
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper extends the stochastic-oracle model of AI-augmented computing to include agentic oracles. Unlike a stationary stochastic oracle, which responds to the same query according to a fixed response distribution across calls, an agentic oracle can pursue a goal autonomously and may access an environment containing task-relevant resources. These capabilities affect both response distributions and token costs beyond what is visible at the query-response interface. We develop a framework for analyzing token costs in Stochastic-Oracle Turing Machines (SOTMs) that compute with agentic oracles. Each call has an orchestration token cost, visible to the caller at the query-response interface, and an agentic token cost, incurred by internal operations not exposed to the caller. We show that an SOTM computing with an agentic oracle that can retain intermediate state can have token-cost advantages over SOTMs using stationary stochastic oracles when solving the same task at the same quality level, both with and without environment access. We also investigate goal-loss risk, including how internal dispatch ordering can reduce exposure to irreversible actions. We provide a goal-loss avoidance criterion, derive progress--retry--goal-loss formulas, establish goal-depth lower bounds on token complexity, characterize token complexity when the probability of goal loss is zero, and show that goal-loss risk can impose an upper bound on the achievable quality of a task involving environment updates.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
11 of 14 references.
References · 11
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,745
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2026Token Complexity Theory for AI-Augmented Computingcited by 3
- 2024AI-Oracle Machines for Intelligent Computingcited by 2
- 2026Token Complexity of Certifying Stochastic-Oracle Reliabilitycited by 2
- 2026Computing with Stochastic Oracles in AI-Augmented Computationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026We Query, Therefore We Compute: On Oracle Computation beyond the Machine, with an Application to Agents
- 2026Computability of Agentic Systems
- 2026Agentic AI Systems Should Be Designed as Marginal Token Allocators
- 2025Speculative Actions: A Lossless Framework for Faster Agentic Systems
- 2026How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Tasks
- 2026Toward Reliable Design of LLM-Enabled Agentic Workflows: Optimizing Latency-Reliability-Cost Tradeoffs
- 2026Can your AI agent be cheaper? Investigating the effects of task specifications on token spend in agentic coding tasks
- 2026Governing Technical Debt in Agentic AI Systems