CallScreenBench: Benchmarking Small Language Models as Phone Secretaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models small enough to run on a handset, quantized to a few bits, are increasingly capable of acting on their user's behalf -- which makes on-device task automation newly plausible. One such task is answering the phone. A phone secretary takes an unknown inbound call on its owner's behalf, and unlike the agents most benchmarks evaluate, it has no cooperative caller-assigned task to complete: the caller holds the goal and may be an adversary, while the secretary must begin deciding how to respond without an oracle. What matters is not task success but whether the owner would endorse how their proxy handled the call. We evaluate only the text-domain conversational decision layer; speech recognition, audio interaction, end-to-end latency, and handset execution are outside scope. We present CallScreenBench, which reports five automated call-and-note measure groups motivated by owner endorsement. Each is paired, where available, with a counter-metric and an uncertainty estimate; no benchmark-wide Q1-Q5 composite or leaderboard score is defined. Three guardedness diagnostics identify candidate cases for a toolless proxy that holds no credentials and calls no tools. Across three model families represented by paired 4-bit checkpoints (0.6-4B), the primary scoring snapshot gives the larger checkpoint higher point estimates on several service, recall, and plausibility measures, while triage discrimination follows a different ordering. Bare scam-side TPR rewards universal suspicion, and pairwise separation changes when legitimate-side false positives are included and across judge snapshots. Scripted degenerate agents expose further floors, including a hangup-and-echo policy with entity recall 1.000. We report quality measures and guardedness channels separately so that a single pass/fail score does not hide their trade-offs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
42 of 66 references.
References · 42
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
- 2024Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialoguecited by 536
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
30 more
- 2024VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistantscited by 192
- 2021NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasetscited by 189
- 2025Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilitiescited by 94
- 2019ACUTE-EVAL: Improved Dialogue Evaluation with Optimized Questions and Multi-turn Comparisonscited by 83
- 2020TurnGPT: a Transformer-based Language Model for Predicting Turn-taking in Spoken Dialogcited by 55
- 2022Voice Activity Projection: Self-supervised Learning of Turn-taking Eventscited by 54
- 2025Talking Turns: Benchmarking Audio Foundation Models on Turn-Taking Dynamicscited by 45
- 2021Semantic Distance: A New Metric for ASR Performance Analysis Towards Spoken Language Understandingcited by 40
- 2026τ-Voice: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Voice Agents on Real-World Domainscited by 30
- 2025URO-Bench: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation for End-to-End Spoken Dialogue Modelscited by 29
- 2026Full-Duplex-Bench-v3: Benchmarking Tool Use for Full-Duplex Voice Agents Under Real-World Disfluencycited by 29
- 2025AudioJudge: Understanding What Works in Large Audio Model Based Speech Evaluationcited by 20
- 2026How well are open sourced AI-generated image detection models out-of-the-box: A comprehensive benchmark studycited by 15
- 2024TTSDS -- Text-to-Speech Distribution Scorecited by 14
- 2025SpeechLLM-as-Judges: Towards General and Interpretable Speech Quality Evaluationcited by 14
- 2024MobileAIBench: Benchmarking LLMs and LMMs for On-Device Use Casescited by 13
- 2021Semantic-WER: A Unified Metric for the Evaluation of ASR Transcript for End Usabilitycited by 12
- 2024Combating Phone Scams with LLM-based Detection: Where Do We Stand?cited by 10
- 2025MULTI-Bench: A Multi-Turn Interactive Benchmark for Assessing Emotional Intelligence ability of Spoken Dialogue Modelscited by 9
- 2025SOVA-Bench: Benchmarking the Speech Conversation Ability for LLM-based Voice Assistantcited by 7
- 2025VocalBench-DF: A Benchmark for Evaluating Speech LLM Robustness to Disfluencycited by 7
- 2026VAmoS Bench: Voice Agent Simulation Benchcited by 6
- 2025VoiceAgentEval: A Dual-Dimensional Benchmark for Expert-Level Intelligent Voice-Agent Evaluation of Xbench's Professional-Aligned Seriescited by 4
- 2025Send to which account? Evaluation of an LLM-based Scambaiting Systemcited by 3
- 2026Whose Side Is Your Agent On? Multi-Party Principal Loyalty in LLM Agentscited by 3
- 2026AEQ-Bench: Measuring Empathy of Omni-Modal Large Modelscited by 2
- 2026Towards Human-Like Interactive Speech Recognition With Agentic Correction and Semantic Evaluationcited by 2
- 2024Characterizing Robocalls with Multiple Vantage Pointscited by 1
- 2026A Reliability Assessment of LALM Audio Judges for Full-Duplex Voice Agentscited by 1
- 2026CallBench: A Benchmark for Dual-Goal Coordination in Phone Call Assistantscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.