mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HP-JEPA: Hierarchical Partitioning for Multi-Resolution Graph Joint-Embedding Predictive Learning

arXiv 2608.00491 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph self-supervised learning aims to learn transferable representations from large-scale unlabeled graph data. Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) avoid explicit negative-pair construction and raw-input reconstruction by predicting masked targets directly in latent space. However, existing graph JEPAs typically rely on a single predefined graph partition, biasing the learned representations toward one structural granularity and limiting their ability to capture complementary patterns at different graph scales. To address this limitation, we propose HP-JEPA, a hierarchical partitioning framework for multi-resolution graph joint-embedding prediction. HP-JEPA organizes each graph into an ordered bank of coarse-to-fine partition resolutions and performs context-target latent prediction separately at each resolution using an online encoder, an exponential-moving-average target encoder, and a latent predictor. The resulting resolution-specific graph representations are subsequently integrated through concatenation or task-specific resolution weighting, allowing downstream models to combine complementary local, regional, and global structural information. Experiments on seven graph classification benchmarks and one graph regression benchmark show that HP-JEPA outperforms the fixed-resolution Graph-JEPA baseline on 6 of 8 tasks, improving upon Graph-JEPA on most evaluated benchmarks. Size-stratified analyses further show that HP-JEPA achieves higher accuracy than Graph-JEPA in most evaluated graph-size quartiles on three representative datasets. These results highlight the effectiveness of hierarchical multi-resolution partitioning for transferable graph representation learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  5. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  6. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
  7. 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
  8. 2020GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-Trainingcited by 463
  9. 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 448
  10. 2019InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 441
  11. 2021Adversarial Graph Augmentation to Improve Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 200
  12. 2021Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via Bootstrappingcited by 186
4 more
  1. 2021From Canonical Correlation Analysis to Self-supervised Graph Neural Networkscited by 141
  2. 2023Graph-level Representation Learning with Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturescited by 22
  3. 2025Does GCL Need a Large Number of Negative Samples? Enhancing Graph Contrastive Learning with Effective and Efficient Negative Samplingcited by 8
  4. 2025GRAIN: Multi-Granular and Implicit Information Aggregation Graph Neural Network for Heterophilous Graphscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.