Interpretability-Guided Soft Pruning of Attention Heads in Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision foundation models, such as DINOv2, learn highly expressive representations but rely on massive, opaque architectures that demand substantial computational power and memory. To provide an interpretable-guided and efficient solution to this issue, we first propose a spectral analysis and new visualization technique for individual attention heads based on the Laplacian eigenvectors of their attention maps. Building upon recent observations regarding the block structure of Vision Transformers, we perform semantic clustering of attention heads and identify functional redundancies. Leveraging these insights, we introduce SAPER (Soft Attention PrunER), an end-to-end differentiable pruning framework based on the LapSum Soft Top-K approach. Extensive experiments on ImageNet-1K demonstrate that SAPER achieves a highly favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off, outperforming the competitive RAPTOR baseline in FLOPs reduction while preserving strong classification performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 43 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
18 more
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
- 2021AdaViT: Adaptive Vision Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 228
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 173
- 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 116
- 2022Vision Transformer Slimming: Multi-Dimension Searching in Continuous Optimization Spacecited by 66
- 2023X-Pruner: eXplainable Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 66
- 2023Zero-TPrune: Zero-Shot Token Pruning through Leveraging of the Attention Graph in Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 61
- 2021Differentiable Subset Pruning of Transformer Headscited by 46
- 2025Hallucination Detection in LLMs Using Spectral Features of Attention Mapscited by 42
- 2021A Unified Pruning Framework for Vision Transformerscited by 40
- 2025Block-Recurrent Dynamics in Vision Transformerscited by 16
- 2025LapSum -- One Method to Differentiate Them All: Ranking, Sorting and Top-k Selectioncited by 12
- 2025ToSA: Token Merging with Spatial Awarenesscited by 11
- 2025Attention (as Discrete-Time Markov) Chainscited by 11
- 2025HEART-VIT: Hessian-Guided Efficient Dynamic Attention and Token Pruning in Vision Transformercited by 2
- 2026Adaptive MLP Pruning for Large Vision Transformerscited by 2
- 2026The Case for Model Science: Verify, Explore, Steer, Refinecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.