mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Physics-Chemistry-Informed Neural Network (PCINN) for Real-Time Spatial-ALD Coverage Prediction and Reliable Kinetics Inversion

arXiv 2608.00212 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial atomic layer deposition (SALD) is a leading atmospheric-pressure, high-throughput route to industrial ALD, but design and control are limited by the cost of predicting surface coverage: high-fidelity CFD is far too slow for operating-window scans, while analytic models miss transport modulation such as the gas curtain. We present a physics-chemistry-informed neural network (PCINN), a hybrid surrogate with CFD-level accuracy at real-time speed: a query returns coverage in about 7 ms, roughly 5x10^4 times faster than a CFD solve, reaching a test R^2_log = 0.998 (leave-one-out R^2_raw = 0.974) from only 30 training cases spanning four orders of magnitude in coverage. The architecture is not a black box: a small network learns only the operating-condition to near-wall concentration closure, while the known surface kinetics is a hard-coded, trainable chemistry layer integrated along the substrate trajectory. This single-scalar bottleneck keeps it accurate under sparse data, interpretable and invertible. We add a full identifiability analysis (Fisher information, profile likelihood). The adsorption energy E_ads and desorption rate k_des are robustly identifiable; k_ads is not separately identifiable at a single temperature (only k_ads*c_wall is). Across four temperatures the prefactor nu and E_ads bind along a weakly identifiable degeneracy valley of slope 0.065 eV/decade, derived analytically as k_B T_eff ln(10) and turned into a reliability diagnostic: a seven-chemistry mismatch matrix shows it is invariant under any single-Arrhenius mismatch and shifts only when a second thermally activated process appears, so a slope departure flags unmodelled site heterogeneity. Data come from simulation with known ground truth inverted by the same kinetic form, so the study verifies pipeline self-consistency and the identifiability boundary, not real parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 43 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  2. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  5. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  6. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 353
  7. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  8. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 235
  9. 2020ChemNODE: A Neural Ordinary Differential Equations Approach for Chemical Kinetics Solverscited by 26
  10. 2021On structural and practical identifiabilitycited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Performance of AI agents based on reasoning language models on ALD process optimization tasks
  2. 2026Toward Mechanistic Interpretability of an AI Foundation Model Fine-Tuned for Atmospheric Chemistry
  3. 2025SwarmThinkers: Learning Physically Consistent Atomic KMC Transitions at Scale
  4. 2026Particle-Guided Diffusion for Gas-Phase Reaction Kinetics
  5. 2025Efficient Exploration of Chemical Kinetics
  6. 2026Towards Spatio-Temporal Extrapolation of Phase-Field Simulations with Convolution-Only Neural Networks
  7. 2025GLOBE: Accurate and Generalizable PDE Surrogates using Domain-Inspired Architectures and Equivariances
  8. 2026Domain-informed Adaptive Sampling for Generalizable PINNs in Metal Additive Manufacturing via Conditional Flow Matching