mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach

arXiv 2608.00030 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Specialised retrieval agents typically surface higher quality results than general-purpose search, but selecting the optimal agent for a given query remains an open problem. Current approaches route queries based on inferred topic or intent, however intent-based selection is fundamentally limited: it does not incorporate signal from retrieved content, and cannot detect when a topically aligned agent produces low-relevance results. We address this by training a small language model via supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning to jointly perform agent selection and structured parameter generation for downstream tool calls, using a hierarchical reward function grounded in retrieval relevance along with query-agent topic alignment. This enables the model to learn task-dependent agent suitability from retrieval performance: which agents reliably yield high-relevance results for which query distributions, and when to redirect queries away from specialised agents despite surface-level topical overlap. On a targeted subset of such agent-query mismatches, the trained model achieves an NDCG@10 of 0.918 compared to 0.539 and 0.490 for two LLM baselines (Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5) that route on intent alone. Overall, it achieves a mean NDCG@10 of 0.771 (+0.177 over Nova Lite, +0.219 over Haiku) with a mean selection latency of 120.1ms, an 82.4% reduction over Nova Lite.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

Builds on

10 of 27 references.

References · 10

  1. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
  2. 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 270
  3. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
  4. 2013A Theoretical Analysis of NDCG Type Ranking Measurescited by 119
  5. 2025BEST-Route: Adaptive LLM Routing with Test-Time Optimal Computecited by 67
  6. 2025DeepRetrieval: Hacking Real Search Engines and Retrievers with Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  7. 2025Advancing Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Cold Startcited by 41
  8. 2024Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classificationcited by 18
  9. 2024ReSLLM: Large Language Models are Strong Resource Selectors for Federated Searchcited by 7
  10. 2025Efficient Federated Search for Retrieval-Augmented Generation using Lightweight Routingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories
  2. 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Search
  3. 2026CoSearch: Joint Training of Reasoning and Document Ranking via Reinforcement Learning for Agentic Search
  4. 2026Plan Before Search: Search Agents Need Plan
  5. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Reinforcement Learning-based Agentic Search: Foundations, Roles, Optimizations, Evaluations, and Applications
  6. 2026GRASP: GRanularity-Aware Search Policy for Agentic RAG
  7. 2025WebSeer: Training Deeper Search Agents through Reinforcement Learning with Self-Reflection
  8. 2026Critic-R: Improving Agentic Search using Instruction-tuned Retrievers with Natural Language Introspective Feedback