mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories

arXiv 2604.04949 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Information retrieval (IR) systems have traditionally been designed and trained for human users, with learning-to-rank methods relying heavily on large-scale human interaction logs such as clicks and dwell time. With the rapid emergence of large language model (LLM) powered search agents, however, retrieval is increasingly consumed by agents rather than human beings, and is embedded as a core component within multi-turn reasoning and action loops. In this setting, retrieval models trained under human-centric assumptions exhibit a fundamental mismatch with the way agents issue queries and consume results. In this work, we argue that retrieval models for agentic search should be trained directly from agent interaction data. We introduce learning to retrieve from agent trajectories as a new training paradigm, where supervision is derived from multi-step agent interactions. Through a systematic analysis of search agent trajectories, we identify key behavioral signals that reveal document utility, including browsing actions, unbrowsed rejections, and post-browse reasoning traces. Guided by these insights, we propose LRAT, a simple yet effective framework that mines high-quality retrieval supervision from agent trajectories and incorporates relevance intensity through weighted optimization. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain deep research benchmarks demonstrate that retrievers trained with LRAT consistently improve evidence recall, end-to-end task success, and execution efficiency across diverse agent architectures and scales. Our results highlight agent trajectories as a practical and scalable supervision source, pointing to a promising direction for retrieval in the era of agentic search.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.

Builds on

26 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025InfoFlow: Reinforcing Search Agent Via Reward Density Optimization30 Oct
  2. 2025Tongyi DeepResearch Technical Report28 Oct
  3. 2025WebExplorer: Explore and Evolve for Training Long-Horizon Web Agents8 Sep
  4. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent8 Aug
  5. 2025A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges3 Aug
  6. 2025Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap22 Jun
  7. 2025Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers26 May
  8. 2025Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models9 Jan

Other references · 18

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  4. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  5. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  6. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
  7. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
  8. 2025DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environmentscited by 268
  9. 2024Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 90
  10. 2024Bridging the Preference Gap between Retrievers and LLMscited by 69
  11. 2025A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applicationscited by 48
  12. 2024Stochastic RAG: End-to-End Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Expected Utility Maximizationcited by 29
6 more
  1. 2024Understand What LLM Needs: Dual Preference Alignment for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 27
  2. 2025Deep Research: A Systematic Surveycited by 23
  3. 2024Are Large Language Models Good at Utility Judgments?cited by 22
  4. 2025Open Data Synthesis For Deep Researchcited by 14
  5. 2023Advancing the Search Frontier with AI Agentscited by 12
  6. 2025NExT-Search: Rebuilding User Feedback Ecosystem for Generative AI Searchcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Multi-Agent Perspective on Modern Information Retrieval
  2. 2026A Picture of Agentic Search
  3. 2026SLMs as Multi-Agent Routers: A Progressive SFT and Reinforcement Learning Approach
  4. 2026Agentic-R: Learning to Retrieve for Agentic Search
  5. 2026Beyond Semantic Similarity: Performance and Costs of Agentic Retrieval for Complex Tasks
  6. 2026Multi-Agent Transactive Memory
  7. 2026Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?
  8. 2026RICE-PO: Turning Retrieval Interactions into Credit Signals for Reasoning Agents