mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration

arXiv 2607.29087 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations. These heterogeneous boundaries pose a deployment challenge, but also create an opportunity: strategically coordinating multiple LLMs may unlock collective intelligence exceeding any single model. Existing approaches fix how models are combined in advance, overlooking the dynamic, state-dependent role of complementarity in complex problem solving. Drawing on the wisdom-of-crowds paradigm, we reconceptualize collective LLM intelligence as relay-style complementarity: a sequential process in which each successor model is selected to address the specific bottleneck identified in its predecessor's output. To operationalize this, we propose WILC (Wisdom Integration of LLM Crowds), a framework grounded in two design principles. First, iterative reflection-and-refinement establishes a state-preserving workflow through which models diagnose and refine prior outputs. Second, complementarity-driven model selection governs transitions via a dual-gate mechanism: prospective complementarity fit (PCF) identifies the worker most suited to the current bottleneck, while posterior complementarity gain (PCG) evaluates whether the selected transition improves the evolving solution. Experiments across four diverse benchmarks show that WILC outperforms existing approaches, including single-model self-refinement, ensemble methods, and query-routing methods. Under standardized pricing assumptions, WILC matches the average benchmark performance of GPT-5.2 at roughly 7 times lower estimated per-query cost, while facilitating data sovereignty through self-hosted deployment. This study extends wisdom-of-crowds theory from static aggregation to sequential AI complementarity and provides transferable design principles for multi-AI coordination.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

33 of 57 references.

References · 33

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  7. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  9. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  10. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  11. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
  12. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 919
21 more
  1. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
  2. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
  3. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 564
  4. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
  5. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 388
  6. 2023MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoningcited by 316
  7. 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 301
  8. 2024Nomic Embed: Training a Reproducible Long Context Text Embeddercited by 265
  9. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 240
  10. 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifiercited by 233
  11. 2023AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generationcited by 216
  12. 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 172
  13. 2024GraphRouter: A Graph-based Router for LLM Selectionscited by 165
  14. 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 145
  15. 2023Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debatecited by 97
  16. 2025Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
  17. 2022Human-Algorithm Collaboration: Achieving Complementarity and Avoiding Unfairnesscited by 45
  18. 2024VisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 45
  19. 2024Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration: Concept, Sources, and Evidencecited by 35
  20. 2023Just Ask One More Time! Self-Agreement Improves Reasoning of Language Models in (Almost) All Scenarioscited by 18
  21. 2025What Makes Reasoning Invalid: Echo Reflection Mitigation for Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.