mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TokenSwap: Benchmarking and Reducing the Modality Gap in Multimodal LLMs

arXiv 2607.28640 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.CL cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) should generate consistent responses given semantically equivalent inputs across modalities. However, we observe a systematic discrepancy in model predictions under such cross-modal variations. Specifically, we define the modality gap as the difference in model performance under semantically equivalent textual and multimodal inputs. We introduce TokenSwap, a method that constructs such inputs by replacing textual concepts with semantically aligned images, resulting in sequences where visual tokens are interleaved with text tokens. Based on TokenSwap, we transform existing text-based benchmarks such as MMLU into image-interleaved counterparts, resulting in TokenSwap-Bench. Across 42 MLLMs, we observe a pervasive modality gap, with performance decreasing by 4.2% to 47.4% when moving from text-only to image-interleaved inputs, averaging 19.6% +/- 3.3% across models. Notably, we observe that reasoning models exhibit consistently smaller gaps, achieving an average gap of 10.1% compared to 25.5% for non-reasoning models. In contrast, neither prompting strategies nor scaling training compute alone reliably reduces the modality gap. Finally, we demonstrate that incorporating TokenSwap during training effectively mitigates this gap while preserving strong text-only and vision-language performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 34 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

34 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs9 Dec
  2. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Report26 Nov
  3. 2025Vision-Language Models Struggle to Align Entities across Modalities5 Mar
  4. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling6 Dec
  5. 2024Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models14 Nov
  6. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution18 Sep
  7. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer6 Aug
  8. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
  9. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
  10. 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models23 Jun

Other references · 24

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  5. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  6. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  7. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  8. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  9. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  10. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  11. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,163
  12. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
12 more
  1. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  2. 2023DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetscited by 635
  3. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  4. 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  5. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 341
  6. 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 55
  7. 2024It's Not a Modality Gap: Characterizing and Addressing the Contrastive Gapcited by 26
  8. 2024Explaining and Mitigating the Modality Gap in Contrastive Multimodal Learningcited by 25
  9. 2024Mitigate the Gap: Investigating Approaches for Improving Cross-Modal Alignment in CLIPcited by 23
  10. 2024OmnixR: Evaluating Omni-modality Language Models on Reasoning across Modalitiescited by 13
  11. 2025SEAM: Semantically Equivalent Across Modalities Benchmark for Vision-Language Modelscited by 6
  12. 2025XModBench: Benchmarking Cross-Modal Capabilities and Consistency in Omni-Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reading, Not Thinking: Understanding and Bridging the Modality Gap When Text Becomes Pixels in Multimodal LLMs
  2. 2025Rethinking the Text-Vision Reasoning Imbalance in MLLMs through the Lens of Training Recipes
  3. 2026Mind the Gap No More: Achieving Zero-Gap Multimodal Integration via One Tokenizer
  4. 2023How to Bridge the Gap between Modalities: Survey on Multimodal Large Language Model
  5. 2024Implicit Multimodal Alignment: On the Generalization of Frozen LLMs to Multimodal Inputs
  6. 2025SO-Bench: A Structural Output Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
  7. 2025Some Modalities are More Equal Than Others: Decoding and Architecting Multimodal Integration in MLLMs
  8. 2026Same Semantics, Different Outcome: On the Modality Robustness of Multimodal LLMs under Knowledge Conflict