mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReDiPPO: Reference-Guided Value Calibration and Discrepancy-Aware Token Reweighting for Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2607.27631 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. Among existing policy optimization methods, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) remains particularly appealing because its learned critic can, in principle, provide token-level credit assignment. However, in mathematical reasoning tasks characterized by long reasoning horizons and sparse outcome rewards, reliable token-level credit assignment remains challenging. The standard critic often fails to accurately evaluate intermediate reasoning states, resulting in noisy advantage estimates and suboptimal policy updates. In this paper, we propose ReDiPPO, a Reference-guided and Discrepancy-aware PPO framework for mathematical reasoning. ReDiPPO introduces a reference-guided critic that uses reference answers as training-time privileged signals to provide more accurate value estimation. Meanwhile, it retains a standard critic and quantifies the token-level reference-standard discrepancy between the standard value estimate and the reference-guided value estimate. This discrepancy serves as an indicator of difficult reasoning states and is used to reweight the corresponding token-level advantages during PPO optimization. Extensive experiments on diverse mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ReDiPPO improves value-estimation accuracy and consistently outperforms strong policy optimization baselines, including PPO, DAPO, and GSPO, in final reasoning performance. Our code is available on https://github.com/cii030/ReDiPPO.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025VAPO: Efficient and Reliable Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Reasoning Tasks7 Apr
  2. 2025What's Behind PPO's Collapse in Long-CoT? Value Optimization Holds the Secret3 Mar
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 6

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
  4. 2025Olmo 3cited by 129
  5. 2026Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  6. 2026GAGPO: Generalized Advantage Grouped Policy Optimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Improving Math Reasoning through Value-guided Informative Search
  2. 2026TPPO: Tracking-Value PPO For Language Model Reasoning
  3. 2026Privy to the Foil: Recasting Value Estimation with a Self-Privileged Critic for RLVR
  4. 2026DISPO: Enhancing Training Efficiency and Stability in Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Mathematical Reasoning
  5. 2026Learning to Use Tools: Reinforcement Learning for Tool-Integrated Mathematical Reasoning
  6. 2025NFT: Bridging Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning in Math Reasoning
  7. 2026Step Potential Advantage Estimation: Harnessing Intermediate Confidence and Correctness for Efficient Mathematical Reasoning
  8. 2026PrAg-PO: Prompt Augmented Policy Optimization for Robust and Diverse Mathematical Reasoning