mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Journey Operators for Structured Multi-Axis Composition

arXiv 2607.26775 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many kinds of data have structure along one or more axes: words in a sentence, pixels in an image, nodes in a tree, frames in audio, or cells in a 3D volume. Along one axis, order matters: "the dog bit the man" is different from "the man bit the dog." Across independent axes, however, neither composition nor movement should depend on the order of axes: in an image, composing right then down should give the same result as composing down then right, and moving right then down should describe the same relative position as moving down then right. We develop a framework for modeling this kind of multi-axis structure. Each data item carries its content together with a small transformation for each axis. A path connecting two positions defines a journey; the journey operator is the product of per-axis transformations along that path, governing both how data composes along the path and how relative position is described. When the transformations are fixed, our framework recovers Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) and its multi-dimensional variants. When they depend on the data, the model gains a content-adaptive positional inductive bias. We show exactly when these paths are well-defined: both composition and movement across axes are path-independent precisely when the axis transformations commute. We also prove that, under the stated toral-frame symmetry, cocycle, bilinearity, and norm-preservation assumptions, the resulting pairwise scoring rule must take the form of block-wise rotations, explaining why RoPE-like methods arise naturally. Finally, we use this theory to design JoFormer, a model for value aggregation, and relate it to attention and state-space models (SSMs). Initial experiments across vision, language, and length generalization suggest that these inductive biases can have observable consequences in practice.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 14 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  2. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  3. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  4. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
  5. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
  6. 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 898
  7. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
  8. 2024Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformercited by 236
  9. 2025ComRoPE: Scalable and Robust Rotary Position Embedding Parameterized by Trainable Commuting Angle Matricescited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Off-Axis, On Purpose: Where a Transformer Computes Concepts and Why it Does So
  2. 2026Retrieved but not ranked: surface-form bias in structural retrieval, from mathematics to agent trajectories
  3. 2025How to Move Your Dragon: Text-to-Motion Synthesis for Large-Vocabulary Objects
  4. 2025Aligning Text, Images, and 3D Structure Token-by-Token
  5. 2024A3D: Does Diffusion Dream about 3D Alignment?
  6. 2023Composite Diffusion | whole >= Sigma parts
  7. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?
  8. 2026Semantic-Structural Alignment for Generative Pictorial Charts