Mergeable Model-Side Aggregation States for Long-Context Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A known limitation of long-context language models is their increasingly unreliable performance in non-additive, set-based aggregation as context length grows. Examples include cardinality estimation, set relationships, and grouped statistics, which widely exist in logs, program outputs, tables, and multi-turn conversations. To provide the aggregation state required by these tasks, we introduce a model-side aggregation interface that maintains compact Hash-based HyperLogLog (HLL) sketch states alongside a frozen language model. While the model processes the context, an extractor maps each relevant record to a canonical identity. The identity is then hashed and updates the HLL state. These states can be merged across context segments and/or read out directly for downstream reasoning, avoiding an additional generate-execute-return cycle. We validate the proposed approach by setting the HLL state size as 2 KiB (2,048 registers), which does not increase with context length or set cardinality. In a distinct-count experiment involving one million records, the mean relative error was 1.6%. In a separate merge test, states built from as many as 256 segments produced exactly the same readout as a single pass over the same stream. On 3,969 aggregate-then-reason tasks from 174 source windows, the fixed-budget interface reached 99.2% accuracy on Gemma 4 (31B, BF16), compared with 100.0% under exact aggregation; the paired gap was 0.8 percentage points (95% window-cluster CI: 0.5-1.3 points). On a matched set of 174 items, our method improved over direct full-context reasoning by 63.2 points on Qwen and 56.3 points on Gemma. The corresponding gains over chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning were 60.9 and 63.2 points, respectively. On a fixed 1,200-task Oolong-Synth subset, our method reached 91.1% on Qwen and 99.3% on Gemma. Code is available at https://github.com/songdc98/sketchops.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2026.
Builds on
15 of 25 references.
References · 15
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 186
- 2019On the Limitations of Representing Functions on Setscited by 89
- 2025Oolong: Evaluating Long Context Reasoning and Aggregation Capabilitiescited by 33
- 2019Improving Attention Mechanism in Graph Neural Networks via Cardinality Preservationcited by 17
- 2026Coding Agents are Effective Long-Context Processorscited by 11
- 2019Meta-Learning Neural Bloom Filterscited by 10
- 2020Partitioned Learned Bloom Filtercited by 10
- 2022Scalable Set Encoding with Universal Mini-Batch Consistency and Unbiased Full Set Gradient Approximationcited by 4
- 2025How Good Are LLMs at Processing Tool Outputs?cited by 4
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ToM: Leveraging Tree-oriented MapReduce for Long-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2024Hierarchical Context Merging: Better Long Context Understanding for Pre-trained LLMs
- 2026Probing How Scalable Table Data Enhances General Long-Context Reasoning
- 2026Chained Recursive Language Models for Multi-Iteration Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Quacking: Deep Integration of Language Models and RAG into DuckDB
- 2024Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
- 2025Fine, I'll Merge It Myself: A Multi-Fidelity Framework for Automated Model Merging
- 2025The Thinking Spectrum: An Empirical Study of Tunable Reasoning in LLMs through Model Merging