mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Attention Mechanism in Graph Neural Networks via Cardinality Preservation

arXiv 1907.02204 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful to learn the representation of graph-structured data. Most of the GNNs use the message-passing scheme, where the embedding of a node is iteratively updated by aggregating the information of its neighbors. To achieve a better expressive capability of node influences, attention mechanism has grown to be popular to assign trainable weights to the nodes in aggregation. Though the attention-based GNNs have achieved remarkable results in various tasks, a clear understanding of their discriminative capacities is missing. In this work, we present a theoretical analysis of the representational properties of the GNN that adopts the attention mechanism as an aggregator. Our analysis determines all cases when those attention-based GNNs can always fail to distinguish certain distinct structures. Those cases appear due to the ignorance of cardinality information in attention-based aggregation. To improve the performance of attention-based GNNs, we propose cardinality preserved attention (CPA) models that can be applied to any kind of attention mechanisms. Our experiments on node and graph classification confirm our theoretical analysis and show the competitive performance of our CPA models.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

17 papers.

Sort: