Gradient-Based Latent Decomposition Reveals Mechanisms of Feature Degradation in Weakly Supervised Mammography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weakly supervised hierarchical models exhibit a persistent asymmetry: coarse lesion-type features are preserved under reconstruction while fine-grained malignancy cues degrade---a pattern with direct consequences for the clinical reliability of breast cancer screening pipelines. We introduce gradient-based orthogonal latent decomposition for hierarchical Variational Autoencoders~(H-VAEs) to mechanistically explain this asymmetry. The latent space is partitioned into a task-aligned component~(z1), shaped by coarse supervisory gradients, and an orthogonal residual~(zres) capturing remaining representational capacity. On~3,550 mammographic Regions of Interest~(ROIs) from CBIS-DDSM, only~~4.4% of latent magnitude aligns with supervisory gradients, leaving~~95.6% in the orthogonal residual upon which fine-grained pathology prediction primarily depends. The model achieves Stage-1~AUC~0.866 and Stage 2~AUC~0.552, with a reconstruction stability gap of Deltadiag=5% (p=0.005) and a classification gap of DeltaAUC=0.314 (p<0.001). Latent ablation confirms that features for both tasks reside heavily in~zres, structurally explaining why reconstruction degrades pathology stability disproportionately. Comparisons with Multi-Instance Learning~(MIL) and Multi-Task Learning~(MTL) confirm generalization across architectures and modalities. These findings reveal that in high-dimensional spaces, a single coarse supervisory signal isolates only a sparse 1D latent direction, forcing critical fine-grained features into the vulnerable residual subspace.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
- 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
- 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
- 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
7 more
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2016Ladder Variational Autoencoderscited by 315
- 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
- 2020Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Images: A Comparative Studycited by 146
- 2017End-to-end Training for Whole Image Breast Cancer Diagnosis using An All Convolutional Designcited by 87
- 2026A Diagnostic Gap Framework for Evaluating Reconstruction Fidelity in Weakly Supervised Mammographycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.