mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Effect of Text Chunk Size on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Performance

arXiv 2607.24767 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Multimodal RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a powerful process for allowing large language models (LLMs) to retrieve relevant information to use as source material during text generation. A critical yet under-explored component of these systems is the granularity at which source documents are segmented into retrievable chunks. The size of these chunks has the potential to significantly influence generation quality, contextual correctness, retrieval precision, and computational efficiency. Despite its importance, chunk size is often selected without proper evaluation of its impact on generation quality. Smaller chunks, such as individual sentences, may allow for precise retrieval by narrowing the focus of each chunk. However, they contain less information, which may limit the model's ability to generate coherent responses. Larger chunks, such as entire chapters, contain lots of broad information that may improve correctness, but also introduce additional noise and increase computational cost. Because larger chunks contain more information, the number of chunks returned to the model must also be considered. This paper evaluates how chunk size, along with the number of retrieved segments, influences generation quality and retrieval effectiveness. By comparing these configurations, this study seeks to better understand how document segmentation affects the performance and efficiency of Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. segmentation affects the performance and efficiency of Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 7 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 8 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Rethinking Chunk Size For Long-Document Retrieval: A Multi-Dataset Analysis27 May
  2. 2024ChunkRAG: Novel LLM-Chunk Filtering Method for RAG Systems25 Oct
  3. 2024Financial Report Chunking for Effective Retrieval Augmented Generation5 Feb

Other references · 4

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  3. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  4. 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 519

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations
  2. 2025Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation with Hierarchical Text Segmentation Chunking
  3. 2025A New HOPE: Domain-agnostic Automatic Evaluation of Text Chunking
  4. 2025Reconstructing Context: Evaluating Advanced Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  5. 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?
  6. 2026Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG
  7. 2024Long Context RAG Performance of Large Language Models
  8. 2026Evaluating Chunking Strategies For Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oil and Gas Enterprise Documents