mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations

arXiv 2606.00881 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Multimodal RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated significant capabilities in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). One of the key tasks in RAG systems is the chunking process. Traditionally, fixed-size chunking and semantic chunking have been the standard approaches. However, interest in chunking strategies has been increasing, leading to a growing number of proposed methods that often claim improved performance over these conventional techniques. Many of these approaches are tailored to specific use cases and data types, with limited evidence of their effectiveness across diverse scenarios. As a result, it remains challenging to directly compare different techniques and assess their relative strengths. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of a wide range of chunking methods and emphasize the underlying challenges of chunking strategies in RAG systems. While chunking is commonly treated as a simple preprocessing step, we show that it introduces a range of impactful and often overlooked issues.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 24 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025HiChunk: Evaluating and Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Hierarchical Chunking15 Sep
  2. 2025MoC: Mixtures of Text Chunking Learners for Retrieval-Augmented Generation System12 Mar
  3. 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?16 Oct
  4. 2024Meta-Chunking: Learning Text Segmentation and Semantic Completion via Logical Perception16 Oct
  5. 2024Searching for Best Practices in Retrieval-Augmented Generation1 Jul

Other references · 19

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  7. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
  8. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
  9. 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
  10. 2023Learning to Filter Context for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 83
  11. 2024Late Chunking: Contextual Chunk Embeddings Using Long-Context Embedding Modelscited by 73
  12. 2024LumberChunker: Long-Form Narrative Document Segmentationcited by 36
7 more
  1. 2024NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokenscited by 32
  2. 2025The Great Nugget Recall: Automating Fact Extraction and RAG Evaluation with Large Language Modelscited by 24
  3. 2025cAST: Enhancing Code Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Structural Chunking via Abstract Syntax Treecited by 17
  4. 2024PIRB: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Polish Dense and Hybrid Text Retrieval Methodscited by 14
  5. 2025S2 Chunking: A Hybrid Framework for Document Segmentation Through Integrated Spatial and Semantic Analysiscited by 8
  6. 2025LiteraryQA: Towards Effective Evaluation of Long-document Narrative QAcited by 6
  7. 2026Beyond Chunk-Then-Embed: A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Evaluation of Document Chunking Strategies for Information Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Effect of Text Chunk Size on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Performance
  2. 2026Evaluating Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Academic Texts
  3. 2025A New HOPE: Domain-agnostic Automatic Evaluation of Text Chunking
  4. 2026Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG
  5. 2025Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation with Hierarchical Text Segmentation Chunking
  6. 2024CoFE-RAG: A Comprehensive Full-chain Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Enhanced Data Diversity
  7. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  8. 2024Financial Report Chunking for Effective Retrieval Augmented Generation