mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG

arXiv 2603.25333 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Multimodal RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

The effectiveness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is highly dependent on how documents are chunked, that is, segmented into smaller units for indexing and retrieval. Yet, commonly used "one-size-fits-all" approaches often fail to capture the nuanced structure and semantics of diverse texts. Despite its central role, chunking lacks a dedicated evaluation framework, making it difficult to assess and compare strategies independently of downstream performance. We challenge this paradigm by introducing Adaptive Chunking, a framework that selects the most suitable chunking strategy for each document based on a set of five novel intrinsic, document-based metrics: References Completeness (RC), Intrachunk Cohesion (ICC), Document Contextual Coherence (DCC), Block Integrity (BI), and Size Compliance (SC), which directly assess chunking quality across key dimensions. To support this framework, we also introduce two new chunkers, an LLM-regex splitter and a split-then-merge recursive splitter, alongside targeted post-processing techniques. On a diverse corpus spanning legal, technical, and social science domains, our metric-guided adaptive method significantly improves downstream RAG performance. Without changing models or prompts, our framework increases RAG outcomes, raising answers correctness to 72% (from 62-64%) and increasing the number of successfully answered questions by over 30% (65 vs. 49). These results demonstrate that adaptive, document-aware chunking, guided by a complementary suite of intrinsic metrics, offers a practical and effective path to more robust RAG systems. Code available at https://github.com/ekimetrics/adaptive-chunking.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MoC: Mixtures of Text Chunking Learners for Retrieval-Augmented Generation System12 Mar
  2. 2024Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost?16 Oct

Other references · 6

  1. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  2. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  3. 2024Late Chunking: Contextual Chunk Embeddings Using Long-Context Embedding Modelscited by 70
  4. 2024LumberChunker: Long-Form Narrative Document Segmentationcited by 36
  5. 2024Maverick: Efficient and Accurate Coreference Resolution Defying Recent Trendscited by 19
  6. 2025CrossFormer: Cross-Segment Semantic Fusion for Document Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A New HOPE: Domain-agnostic Automatic Evaluation of Text Chunking
  2. 2026Chunking Methods on Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Effectiveness Evaluation Against Computational Cost and Limitations
  3. 2024Financial Report Chunking for Effective Retrieval Augmented Generation
  4. 2026Evaluating Chunking Strategies For Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oil and Gas Enterprise Documents
  5. 2025Rethinking Chunk Size For Long-Document Retrieval: A Multi-Dataset Analysis
  6. 2026Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion
  7. 2026A Systematic Investigation of Document Chunking Strategies and Embedding Sensitivity
  8. 2025HiChunk: Evaluating and Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Hierarchical Chunking