From Machine Learning to Large-Scale EO Products: Best Practices for Making Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen a rapid expansion in the production of large-scale geospatial maps derived from Earth observation (EO) data, driven largely by advances in machine learning (ML) and large computing infrastructure. Although the barrier to generating such maps has dropped substantially, established best practices have yet to emerge, and design decisions made early in the pipeline can quietly propagate errors into the final product. Producing a technically sound and scientifically credible product remains challenging. Choices made at every stage are tightly coupled: preprocessing decisions shape the training signal, dataset design governs what the model can learn and how reliably its performance can be assessed, and global-scale inference introduces engineering challenges in compute and data access at scale, as well as artifact mitigation. Furthermore, uncertainty quantification and independent map validation each require dedicated methodological attention that is often underestimated. This paper presents a concise, end-to-end account of the recommended practices spanning the pipeline from satellite data to an operational map product. We organize the discussion around six interconnected themes: the EO data infrastructure landscape, data selection and preprocessing, ML dataset construction and model training, uncertainty quantification, map production and distribution, and validation. This paper is a condensed version of a longer guide that provides greater depth across all stages, accessible online at ghjuliasialelli.github.io/ML-EO-Maps/.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
18 of 41 references.
References · 18
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
- 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 149
- 2021Panoptic Segmentation of Satellite Image Time Series with Convolutional Temporal Attention Networkscited by 143
- 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 137
- 2022A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earthcited by 91
- 2021TorchGeo: Deep Learning With Geospatial Datacited by 73
- 2023Very high resolution canopy height maps from RGB imagery using self-supervised vision transformer and convolutional decoder trained on Aerial Lidarcited by 60
- 2025TESSERA: Temporal Embeddings of Surface Spectra for Earth Representation and Analysiscited by 39
- 2024Major TOM: Expandable Datasets for Earth Observationcited by 32
- 2018Tiling and Stitching Segmentation Output for Remote Sensing: Basic Challenges and Recommendationscited by 24
- 2025OlmoEarth: Stable Latent Image Modeling for Multimodal Earth Observationcited by 24
6 more
- 2024Estimating Canopy Height at Scalecited by 16
- 2025Capturing Temporal Dynamics in Large-Scale Canopy Tree Height Estimationcited by 10
- 2024Mapping Global Floods with 10 Years of Satellite Radar Datacited by 8
- 2024Facilitating Advanced Sentinel-2 Analysis Through a Simplified Computation of Nadir BRDF Adjusted Reflectancecited by 4
- 2025TEMPO: Global Temporal Building Density and Height Estimation from Satellite Imagerycited by 3
- 2026ECHOSAT: Estimating Canopy Height Over Space And Timecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Earth Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026Earth Embeddings4 Aug 2026